On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:14 PM Florian Haas <florian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 14/10/2019 13:29, Dan van der Ster wrote: > >> Hi Dan, > >> > >> what's in the log is (as far as I can see) consistent with the pg query > >> output: > >> > >> 2019-10-14 08:33:57.345 7f1808fb3700 0 log_channel(cluster) log [DBG] : > >> 10.10d scrub starts > >> 2019-10-14 08:33:57.345 7f1808fb3700 -1 log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : > >> 10.10d scrub : stat mismatch, got 0/1 objects, 0/0 clones, 0/1 dirty, > >> 0/0 omap, 0/0 pinned, 0/0 hit_set_archive, 0/0 whiteouts, 0/11 bytes, > >> 0/0 manifest objects, 0/0 hit_set_archive bytes. > >> 2019-10-14 08:33:57.345 7f1808fb3700 -1 log_channel(cluster) log [ERR] : > >> 10.10d scrub 1 errors > >> > >> Have you seen this before? > > > > Yes occasionally we see stat mismatches -- repair always fixes > > definitively though. > > Not here, sadly. That error keeps coming back, always in the same PG, > and only in that PG. > > > Are you using PG autoscaling? There's a known issue there which > > generates stat mismatches. > > I'd appreciate a link to more information if you have one, but a PG > autoscaling problem wouldn't really match with the issue already > appearing in pre-Nautilus releases. :) https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/30479 -- dan > > Cheers, > Florian > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |