On Fri, 10 May 2019, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:27:11PM +0000, Sage Weil wrote: > > If you are a Ceph developer who has contributed code to Ceph and object to > > this change of license, please let us know, either by replying to this > > message or by commenting on that pull request. > Am I correct in reading the diff that only a very small number of files > did not already have the 'or later' clause of *GPL in effect? To the contrary, I think one file (the COPYING file) has one line as a catch-all for everything (that isn't a special case) which is changing from 2.1 to 2.1 or 3. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/22446/files#diff-7116ef0705885343c9e1b2171a06be0eR6 > As a slight tangent, can we get SPDX tags on files rather than this > hard-to-parse text? (/me googles SPDX) Sure? The current format is based on the Debian copyright file format, which seemed appropriate at the time. Happy to take patches that add more appropriate annotations... sage _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |