Re: RFC: relicence Ceph LGPL-2.1 code as LGPL-2.1 or LGPL-3.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:27:11PM +0000, Sage Weil wrote:
> If you are a Ceph developer who has contributed code to Ceph and object to 
> this change of license, please let us know, either by replying to this 
> message or by commenting on that pull request.
Am I correct in reading the diff that only a very small number of files
did not already have the 'or later' clause of *GPL in effect?

As a slight tangent, can we get SPDX tags on files rather than this
hard-to-parse text?

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
E-Mail   : robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux