Thanks a lot for the clarification. /Maged
On 16/05/2019 17:23, David Disseldorp wrote:
Hi Maged,
On Fri, 10 May 2019 18:32:15 +0200, Maged Mokhtar wrote:
What is the recommended way for Samba gateway integration: using
vfs_ceph or mounting CephFS via kernel client ? i tested the kernel
solution in a ctdb setup and gave good performance, does it have any
limitations relative to vfs_ceph ?
At this stage kernel-backed and vfs_ceph-backed shares are pretty
similar feature wise. ATM kernel backed shares have the performance
advantage of page-cache + async vfs_default dispatch. vfs_ceph will
likely gain more features in future as cross-protocol share-mode locks
and leases can be supported without the requirement for a kernel
interface.
Cheers, David
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
