Hi Maged, On Fri, 10 May 2019 18:32:15 +0200, Maged Mokhtar wrote: > What is the recommended way for Samba gateway integration: using > vfs_ceph or mounting CephFS via kernel client ? i tested the kernel > solution in a ctdb setup and gave good performance, does it have any > limitations relative to vfs_ceph ? At this stage kernel-backed and vfs_ceph-backed shares are pretty similar feature wise. ATM kernel backed shares have the performance advantage of page-cache + async vfs_default dispatch. vfs_ceph will likely gain more features in future as cross-protocol share-mode locks and leases can be supported without the requirement for a kernel interface. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |