On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 17:05, Paul Emmerich <paul.emmerich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > No, the problem is that a storage system should never tell a client > that it has written data if it cannot guarantee that the data is still > there if one device fails. [...] Ah, now I got your point. Anyways, it should be users' choice (with warning probably, but still). I can easily (but with heavy heart) remind what happened twice and not too long ago when someone decided "we better know what to do than users^W pilots do". Too many similar decisions were and (still are) popping up in IT industry too. Of course always "for good reasons" -- who'd have a doubt(?)... Oh, and BTW -- is it not possible to change EC(2,1)'s 3/3 to 3/2 in Luminous, is it? -- End of message. Next message? _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |