On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 14:46, Paul Emmerich <paul.emmerich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, I just realized I didn't answer your original question. [...] No problemo. -- I've figured out the answer to my own question earlier anyways. And actually gave a hint today http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2019-April/034278.html based on those findings. > Regarding min_size: yes, you are right about a 2+1 pool being created > with min_size 2 by default in the latest Nautilus release. > This seems like a bug to me, I've opened a ticket here: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/39307 Looked at it, didn't see any explanation of your point of view. If there're 2 active data instances (and 3rd is missing) how is it different to replicated pools with 3/2 config(?) [... overquoting removed ...] -- End of message. Next message? _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |