On 11/7/18 12:30 AM, Hayashida, Mami wrote: > So, currently this is what /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-60 shows. Is it not > correct? I don't know what I should expect to see. > > root@osd1:~# ls -l /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-60 > total 86252 > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 384 Nov 2 16:20 activate.monmap > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 10737418240 Nov 5 16:32 block > lrwxrwxrwx 1 ceph ceph 14 Nov 2 16:20 block.db -> /dev/ssd0/db60 > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 2 Nov 2 16:20 bluefs > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 37 Nov 2 16:20 ceph_fsid > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 37 Nov 2 16:20 fsid > -rw------- 1 ceph ceph 57 Nov 2 16:20 keyring > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 8 Nov 2 16:20 kv_backend > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 21 Nov 2 16:20 magic > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 4 Nov 2 16:20 mkfs_done > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 41 Nov 2 16:20 osd_key > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 6 Nov 2 16:20 ready > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 10 Nov 2 16:20 type > -rw-r--r-- 1 ceph ceph 3 Nov 2 16:20 whoami Are all the other OSDs like this? What is mounted on those directories (i.e. what do "df" and "mount" show)? All those files are dated Nov 2, yet it should be a tmpfs and you rebooted after that date, so I think something's wrong here. > The disk I am using for this osd (osd.60) is a 3.7TB hdd. > > lsblk shows > > sdh 8:112 0 3.7T 0 disk > └─hdd60-data60 252:1 0 3.7T 0 lvm > > and "ceph osd tree" shows > 60 hdd 3.63689 osd.60 up 1.00000 1.00000 That looks correct as far as the weight goes, but I'm really confused as to why you have a 10GB "block" file. That should be a symlink to the hdd60/data60 device as far as I know. -- Hector Martin (hector@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |