On 08/22/2018 08:57 PM, David Turner wrote: > My initial reaction to this PR/backport was questioning why such a > major update would happen on a dot release of Luminous. Your > reaction to keeping both dashboards viable goes to support that. > Should we really be backporting features into a dot release that > force people to change how they use the software? That seems more of > the purpose of having new releases. This is indeed an unusual case. But considering that the Dashboard does not really change any of the Ceph core functionality but adds a lot of value by improving the usability and manageability of Ceph, we agreed with Sage on making an exception here. > I haven't really used either dashboard though. Other than adding > admin functionality, does it remove any functionality of the previous > dashboard? Like Kai wrote, our initial goal was to reach feature parity with Dashboard v1, in order to not introduce a regression when replacing it. In the meanwhile, Dashboard v2 is way beyond that and we have added a lot of additional functionality, e.g. RBD and RGW management. With backporting this to Luminous, we also hope to reach a larger audience of users that have not updated to Mimic yet. Lenz -- SUSE Linux GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nuernberg (Germany) GF:Felix Imendörffer,Jane Smithard,Graham Norton,HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
