On 18.07.2018 00:43, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> But you could also do workaround like letting it choose (K+M)/2
racks
> and putting two shards in each rack.
Oh yes, you are more susceptible to top-of-rack switch failures in this
case or whatever. It's just one option — many people are less concerned
Would I set failure domain to host, in this case?
Or still to rack?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
