That seems to be the issue - we need to understand why rename sees them as different.
Ric
On Fri, May 25, 2018, 9:15 AM Oliver Freyermuth <freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mhhhm... that's funny, I checked an mv with an strace now. I get:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
access("/cephfs/some_folder/file", W_OK) = 0
rename("foo", "/cephfs/some_folder/file") = -1 EXDEV (Invalid cross-device link)
unlink("/cephfs/some_folder/file") = 0
lgetxattr("foo", "security.selinux", "system_u:object_r:fusefs_t:s0", 255) = 30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But I can assure it's only a single filesystem, and a single ceph-fuse client running.
Same happens when using absolute paths.
Cheers,
Oliver
Am 25.05.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Ric Wheeler:
> We should look at what mv uses to see if it thinks the directories are on different file systems.
>
> If the fstat or whatever it looks at is confused, that might explain it.
>
> Ric
>
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2018, 9:04 AM Oliver Freyermuth <freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Am 25.05.2018 um 14:57 schrieb Ric Wheeler:
> > Is this move between directories on the same file system?
>
> It is, we only have a single CephFS in use. There's also only a single ceph-fuse client running.
>
> What's different, though, are different ACLs set for source and target directory, and owner / group,
> but I hope that should not matter.
>
> All the best,
> Oliver
>
> > Rename as a system call only works within a file system.
> >
> > The user space mv command becomes a copy when not the same file system.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ric
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018, 8:51 AM John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:jspray@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jspray@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Oliver Freyermuth
> > <freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> > > Dear Cephalopodians,
> > >
> > > I was wondering why a simple "mv" is taking extraordinarily long on CephFS and must note that,
> > > at least with the fuse-client (12.2.5) and when moving a file from one directory to another,
> > > the file appears to be copied first (byte by byte, traffic going through the client?) before the initial file is deleted.
> > >
> > > Is this true, or am I missing something?
> >
> > A mv should not involve copying a file through the client -- it's
> > implemented in the MDS as a rename from one location to another.
> > What's the observation that's making it seem like the data is going
> > through the client?
> >
> > John
> >
> > >
> > > For large files, this might be rather time consuming,
> > > and we should certainly advise all our users to not move files around needlessly if this is the case.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ceph-users mailing list
> > > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> >
>
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
