Re: (yet another) multi active mds advise needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/19/2018 01:13 AM, Webert de Souza Lima wrote:
> New question: will it make any difference in the balancing if instead of
> having the MAIL directory in the root of cephfs and the domains's
> subtrees inside it, I discard the parent dir and put all the subtress right in cephfs root?

the balancing between the MDS is influenced by which directories are
accessed, the currently accessed directory-trees are diveded between the
MDS's (also check the dirfrag option in the docs). assuming you have the
same access pattern, the "fragmentation" between the MDS's happens at
these "target-directories", so it doesn't matter if these directories
are further up or down in the same filesystem tree.

in the multi-MDS scenario where the MDS serving rank 0 fails, the
effects in the moment of the failure for any cephfs client accessing a
directory/file are the same (as described in an earlier mail),
regardless on which level the directory/file is within the filesystem.

Regards,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux