Apologies, corrected second link: http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2017-March/016663.html
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Brian Andrus <brian.andrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please see the following mailing list topics that have covered this topic in detail:"2x replication: A BIG warning":"replica questions":On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ian Bobbitt <ibobbitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:______________________________I'm working on the specifications for a very small Ceph cluster for VM images (OpenStack/QEMU-KVM/etc).
I'm being asked to justify sticking with the default redundancy levels (size=3, min_size=2) rather than dropping them to
size=2, min_size=1.
Can someone help me articulate why we should be keeping 3 copies, beyond "it's the default"?
-- Ian
_________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
--Brian Andrus | Cloud Systems Engineer | DreamHostbrian.andrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | www.dreamhost.com
Brian Andrus | Cloud Systems Engineer | DreamHost
brian.andrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | www.dreamhost.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
