Re: Why size=3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please see the following mailing list topics that have covered this topic in detail:

"2x replication: A BIG warning":
https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg32915.html

"replica questions":
https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg32915.html

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ian Bobbitt <ibobbitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm working on the specifications for a very small Ceph cluster for VM images (OpenStack/QEMU-KVM/etc).

I'm being asked to justify sticking with the default redundancy levels (size=3, min_size=2) rather than dropping them to
size=2, min_size=1.

Can someone help me articulate why we should be keeping 3 copies, beyond "it's the default"?

-- Ian


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




--
Brian Andrus | Cloud Systems Engineer | DreamHost
brian.andrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | www.dreamhost.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux