Re: [CLUSTER STUCK] Luminous cluster stuck when adding monitor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not sure if I mentioned before: adding a new monitor also puts the whole
cluster into stuck state.

Some minutes ago I did:

root@server1:~# ceph mon add server2 2a0a:e5c0::92e2:baff:fe4e:6614
port defaulted to 6789; adding mon.server2 at [2a0a:e5c0::92e2:baff:fe4e:6614]:6789/0

And then started the daemon on server2:

ceph-mon -i server2 --pid-file  /var/lib/ceph/run/mon.server2.pid -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf --cluster ceph --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph -d 2>&1 | tee ~/cephmonlog-2017-10-08-2

And now the cluster hangs (as in ceph -s does not return).

Looking at mon_status of server5, shows that server5 thinks it is time
for electing [0].

When stopping the monitor on server2 and trying to remove server2 again,
the removal command also gets stuck and never returns:

root@server1:~# ceph mon rm server2

As our cluster is now severely degraded, I was wondering if anyone has a
quick hint on how to get ceph -s back working and/or remove server2
and/or how to readd server1?

Best,

Nico


[0]

[10:50:38] server5:~# ceph daemon mon.server5 mon_status
{
    "name": "server5",
    "rank": 0,
    "state": "electing",
    "election_epoch": 6087,
    "quorum": [],
    "features": {
        "required_con": "153140804152475648",
        "required_mon": [
            "kraken",
            "luminous"
        ],
        "quorum_con": "2305244844532236283",
        "quorum_mon": [
            "kraken",
            "luminous"
        ]
    },
    "outside_quorum": [],
    "extra_probe_peers": [
        "[2a0a:e5c0::92e2:baff:fe4e:6614]:6789/0"
    ],
    "sync_provider": [],
    "monmap": {
        "epoch": 11,
        "fsid": "26c0c5a8-d7ce-49ac-b5a7-bfd9d0ba81ab",
        "modified": "2017-10-08 10:43:49.667986",
        "created": "2017-05-16 22:33:04.500528",
        "features": {
            "persistent": [
                "kraken",
                "luminous"
            ],
            "optional": []
        },
        "mons": [
            {
                "rank": 0,
                "name": "server5",
                "addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::21b:21ff:fe85:a3a2]:6789/0",
                "public_addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::21b:21ff:fe85:a3a2]:6789/0"
            },
            {
                "rank": 1,
                "name": "server3",
                "addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::21b:21ff:fe85:a42a]:6789/0",
                "public_addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::21b:21ff:fe85:a42a]:6789/0"
            },
            {
                "rank": 2,
                "name": "server2",
                "addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::92e2:baff:fe4e:6614]:6789/0",
                "public_addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::92e2:baff:fe4e:6614]:6789/0"
            },
            {
                "rank": 3,
                "name": "server1",
                "addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::92e2:baff:fe8a:2e78]:6789/0",
                "public_addr": "[2a0a:e5c0::92e2:baff:fe8a:2e78]:6789/0"
            }
        ]
    },
    "feature_map": {
        "mon": {
            "group": {
                "features": "0x1ffddff8eea4fffb",
                "release": "luminous",
                "num": 1
            }
        },
        "client": {
            "group": {
                "features": "0x1ffddff8eea4fffb",
                "release": "luminous",
                "num": 4
            }
        }
    }
}




Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Good evening Joao,
>
> we double checked our MTUs, they are all 9200 on the servers and 9212 on
> the switches. And we have no problems transferring big files in general
> (as opennebula copies around images for importing, we do this quite a
> lot).
>
> So if you could have a look, it would be much appreciated.
>
> If we should collect other logs, just let us know.
>
> Best,
>
> Nico
>
> Joao Eduardo Luis <joao@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On 10/04/2017 09:19 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>>> Oh, hmm, you're right. I see synchronization starts but it seems to
>>> progress very slowly, and it certainly doesn't complete in that 2.5
>>> minute logging window. I don't see any clear reason why it's so
>>> slow; it might be more clear if you could provide logs of the other
>>> logs at the same time (especially since you now say they are getting
>>> stuck in the electing state during that period). Perhaps Kefu or
>>> Joao will have some clearer idea what the problem is.
>>> -Greg
>>
>> I haven't gone through logs yet (maybe Friday, it's late today and
>> it's a holiday tomorrow), but not so long ago I seem to recall someone
>> having a similar issue with the monitors that was solely related to a
>> switch's MTU being too small.
>>
>> Maybe that could be the case? If not, I'll take a look at the logs as
>> soon as possible.
>>
>>   -Joao
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:04 PM Nico Schottelius
>>> <nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Some more detail:
>>>
>>>     when restarting the monitor on server1, it stays in synchronizing state
>>>     forever.
>>>
>>>     However the other two monitors change into electing state.
>>>
>>>     I have double checked that there are not (host) firewalls active and
>>>     that the times are within 1 second different of the hosts (they all have
>>>     ntpd running).
>>>
>>>     We are running everything on IPv6, but this should not be a problem,
>>>     should it?
>>>
>>>     Best,
>>>
>>>     Nico
>>>
>>>
>>>     Nico Schottelius <nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>     <mailto:nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx>> writes:
>>>
>>>      > Hello Gregory,
>>>      >
>>>      > the logfile I produced has already debug mon = 20 set:
>>>      >
>>>      > [21:03:51] server1:~# grep "debug mon" /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
>>>      > debug mon = 20
>>>      >
>>>      > It is clear that server1 is out of quorum, however how do we make it
>>>      > being part of the quorum again?
>>>      >
>>>      > I expected that the quorum finding process is triggered automatically
>>>      > after restarting the monitor, or is that incorrect?
>>>      >
>>>      > Best,
>>>      >
>>>      > Nico
>>>      >
>>>      >
>>>      > Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>     writes:
>>>      >
>>>      >> You'll need to change the config so that it's running "debug mon
>>>     = 20" for
>>>      >> the log to be very useful here. It does say that it's dropping
>>>     client
>>>      >> connections because it's been out of quorum for too long, which
>>>     is the
>>>      >> correct behavior in general. I'd imagine that you've got clients
>>>     trying to
>>>      >> connect to the new monitor instead of the ones already in the
>>>     quorum and
>>>      >> not passing around correctly; this is all configurable.
>>>      >>
>>>      >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:09 AM Nico Schottelius <
>>>      >> nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>     <mailto:nico.schottelius@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>>      >>
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> Good morning,
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> we have recently upgraded our kraken cluster to luminous and
>>>     since then
>>>      >>> noticed an odd behaviour: we cannot add a monitor anymore.
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> As soon as we start a new monitor (server2), ceph -s and ceph
>>>     -w start to
>>>      >>> hang.
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> The situation became worse, since one of our staff stopped an
>>>     existing
>>>      >>> monitor (server1), as restarting that monitor results in the same
>>>      >>> situation, ceph -s hangs until we stop the monitor again.
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> We kept the monitor running for some minutes, but the situation
>>>     never
>>>      >>> cleares up.
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> The network does not have any firewall in between the nodes and
>>>     there
>>>      >>> are no host firewalls.
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> I have attached the output of the monitor on server1, running in
>>>      >>> foreground using
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> root@server1:~# ceph-mon -i server1 --pid-file
>>>      >>> /var/lib/ceph/run/mon.server1.pid -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf
>>>     --cluster ceph
>>>      >>> --setuser ceph --setgroup ceph -d 2>&1 | tee cephmonlog
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> Does anyone see any obvious problem in the attached log?
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> Any input or hint would be appreciated!
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> Best,
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> Nico
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>>
>>>      >>> --
>>>      >>> Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit
>>>     www.datacenterlight.ch <http://www.datacenterlight.ch>
>>>      >>> _______________________________________________
>>>      >>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>      >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>      >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>      >>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     --
>>>     Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit
>>>     www.datacenterlight.ch <http://www.datacenterlight.ch>
>>>


--
Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux