Re: Fwd: FileStore vs BlueStore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Burkhard Linke said:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> On 09/20/2017 12:24 PM, Sean Purdy wrote:
> >On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Burkhard Linke said:
> >>The main reason for having a journal with filestore is having a block device
> >>that supports synchronous writes. Writing to a filesystem in a synchronous
> >>way (e.g. including all metadata writes) results in a huge performance
> >>penalty.
> >>
> >>With bluestore the data is also stored on a block devices, and thus also
> >>allows to perform synchronous writes directly (given the backing storage is
> >>handling sync writes correctly and in a consistent way, e.g. no drive
> >>caches, bbu for raid controllers/hbas). And similar to the filestore journal
> >Our Bluestore disks are hosted on RAID controllers.  Should I set cache policy as WriteThrough for these disks then?
> 
> It depends on the setup and availability of a BBU. If you have a BBU and
> cache on the controller, using write back should be ok if you monitor the
> BBU state. To be on the safe side is using write through and live with the
> performance impact.

We do have BBU and cache and we do monitor state.  Thanks!

Sean
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux