Re: Stealth Jewel release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Xiaoxi Chen <superdebuger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +However, it also introduced a regression that could cause MDS damage.
> +Therefore, we do *not* recommend that Jewel users upgrade to this version -
> +instead, we recommend upgrading directly to v10.2.9 in which the regression is
> +fixed.
>
> It looks like this version is NOT production ready. Curious why we
> want a not-recwaended version  to be released?

We found a regression in MDS right after packages were built, and the release
was about to be announced. This is why we didn't announce the release.
We're  currently running tests after the fix for MDS was merged.

So when we do announce the release we'll announce 10.2.9 so that users
can upgrade from 10.2.7->10.2.9

Best,
Abhishek

> 2017-07-12 22:44 GMT+08:00 David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> The lack of communication on this makes me tentative to upgrade to it.  Are
>> the packages available to Ubuntu/Debian systems production ready and
>> intended for upgrades?
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:33 PM Brad Hubbard <bhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:58 AM, David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I haven't seen any release notes for 10.2.8 yet.  Is there a document
>>> > somewhere stating what's in the release?
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16274 for now although it should
>>> make it into the master doc tree soon.
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 1:41 AM Henrik Korkuc <lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On 17-07-10 08:29, Christian Balzer wrote:
>>> >> > Hello,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > so this morning I was greeted with the availability of 10.2.8 for
>>> >> > both
>>> >> > Jessie and Stretch (much appreciated), but w/o any announcement here
>>> >> > or
>>> >> > updated release notes on the website, etc.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Any reason other "Friday" (US time) for this?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Christian
>>> >>
>>> >> My guess is that they didn't have time to announce it yet. Maybe pkgs
>>> >> were not ready yet on friday?
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> ceph-users mailing list
>>> >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > ceph-users mailing list
>>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Brad
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux