Re: Stealth Jewel release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Abhishek L
<abhishek.lekshmanan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Xiaoxi Chen <superdebuger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +However, it also introduced a regression that could cause MDS damage.
>> +Therefore, we do *not* recommend that Jewel users upgrade to this version -
>> +instead, we recommend upgrading directly to v10.2.9 in which the regression is
>> +fixed.
>>
>> It looks like this version is NOT production ready. Curious why we
>> want a not-recwaended version  to be released?
>
> We found a regression in MDS right after packages were built, and the release
> was about to be announced. This is why we didn't announce the release.
> We're  currently running tests after the fix for MDS was merged.
>
> So when we do announce the release we'll announce 10.2.9 so that users
> can upgrade from 10.2.7->10.2.9

Suppose some users already upgraded their CephFS to 10.2.8 -- what is
the immediate recommended course of action? Downgrade or wait for the
10.2.9 ?

Cheers, Dan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux