Hi Sam,
another idea: I have two HDDs here and already wanted to add them to ceph5, so that I would need a new crush map. Could this problem be solved by doing this?
> Am 10.01.2017 um 17:50 schrieb Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Shinobu isn't correct, you have 9/9 osds up and running. up does not
> equal acting because crush is having trouble fulfilling the weights in
> your crushmap and the acting set is being padded out with an extra osd
> which happens to have the data to keep you up to the right number of
> replicas. Please refer back to Brad's post.
> -Sam
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Marcus Müller <mueller.marcus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Ok, i understand but how can I debug why they are not running as they should? For me I thought everything is fine because ceph -s said they are up and running.
>>
>> I would think of a problem with the crush map.
>>
>>> Am 10.01.2017 um 08:06 schrieb Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>> e.g.,
>>> OSD7 / 3 / 0 are in the same acting set. They should be up, if they
>>> are properly running.
>>>
>>> # 9.7
>>> <snip>
>>>> "up": [
>>>> 7,
>>>> 3
>>>> ],
>>>> "acting": [
>>>> 7,
>>>> 3,
>>>> 0
>>>> ],
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Here is an example:
>>>
>>> "up": [
>>> 1,
>>> 0,
>>> 2
>>> ],
>>> "acting": [
>>> 1,
>>> 0,
>>> 2
>>> ],
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Marcus Müller <mueller.marcus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not perfectly correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> OSD.0/1/2 seem to be down.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry but where do you see this? I think this indicates that they are up: osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Am 10.01.2017 um 07:50 schrieb Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Marcus Müller <mueller.marcus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> All osds are currently up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> health HEALTH_WARN
>>>>>> 4 pgs stuck unclean
>>>>>> recovery 4482/58798254 objects degraded (0.008%)
>>>>>> recovery 420522/58798254 objects misplaced (0.715%)
>>>>>> noscrub,nodeep-scrub flag(s) set
>>>>>> monmap e9: 5 mons at
>>>>>> {ceph1=192.168.10.3:6789/0,ceph2=192.168.10.4:6789/0,ceph3=192.168.10.5:6789/0,ceph4=192.168.60.6:6789/0,ceph5=192.168.60.11:6789/0}
>>>>>> election epoch 478, quorum 0,1,2,3,4
>>>>>> ceph1,ceph2,ceph3,ceph4,ceph5
>>>>>> osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs
>>>>>> flags noscrub,nodeep-scrub
>>>>>> pgmap v9981077: 320 pgs, 3 pools, 4837 GB data, 19140 kobjects
>>>>>> 15070 GB used, 40801 GB / 55872 GB avail
>>>>>> 4482/58798254 objects degraded (0.008%)
>>>>>> 420522/58798254 objects misplaced (0.715%)
>>>>>> 316 active+clean
>>>>>> 4 active+remapped
>>>>>> client io 56601 B/s rd, 45619 B/s wr, 0 op/s
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This did not chance for two days or so.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By the way, my ceph osd df now looks like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ID WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR
>>>>>> 0 1.28899 1.00000 3724G 1699G 2024G 45.63 1.69
>>>>>> 1 1.57899 1.00000 3724G 1708G 2015G 45.87 1.70
>>>>>> 2 1.68900 1.00000 3724G 1695G 2028G 45.54 1.69
>>>>>> 3 6.78499 1.00000 7450G 1241G 6208G 16.67 0.62
>>>>>> 4 8.39999 1.00000 7450G 1228G 6221G 16.49 0.61
>>>>>> 5 9.51500 1.00000 7450G 1239G 6210G 16.64 0.62
>>>>>> 6 7.66499 1.00000 7450G 1265G 6184G 16.99 0.63
>>>>>> 7 9.75499 1.00000 7450G 2497G 4952G 33.52 1.24
>>>>>> 8 9.32999 1.00000 7450G 2495G 4954G 33.49 1.24
>>>>>> TOTAL 55872G 15071G 40801G 26.97
>>>>>> MIN/MAX VAR: 0.61/1.70 STDDEV: 13.16
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you can see, now osd2 also went down to 45% Use and „lost“ data. But I
>>>>>> also think this is no problem and ceph just clears everything up after
>>>>>> backfilling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 10.01.2017 um 07:29 schrieb Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking at ``ceph -s`` you originally provided, all OSDs are up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But looking at ``pg query``, OSD.0 / 1 are not up. Are they something
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not perfectly correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> OSD.0/1/2 seem to be down.
>>>>>
>>>>>> like related to ?:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ceph1, ceph2 and ceph3 are vms on one physical host
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are those OSDs running on vm instances?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # 9.7
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "state": "active+remapped",
>>>>>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>>>>>> "epoch": 3114,
>>>>>> "up": [
>>>>>> 7,
>>>>>> 3
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>> "acting": [
>>>>>> 7,
>>>>>> 3,
>>>>>> 0
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # 7.84
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "state": "active+remapped",
>>>>>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>>>>>> "epoch": 3114,
>>>>>> "up": [
>>>>>> 4,
>>>>>> 8
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>> "acting": [
>>>>>> 4,
>>>>>> 8,
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # 8.1b
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "state": "active+remapped",
>>>>>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>>>>>> "epoch": 3114,
>>>>>> "up": [
>>>>>> 4,
>>>>>> 7
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>> "acting": [
>>>>>> 4,
>>>>>> 7,
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # 7.7a
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "state": "active+remapped",
>>>>>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>>>>>> "epoch": 3114,
>>>>>> "up": [
>>>>>> 7,
>>>>>> 4
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>> "acting": [
>>>>>> 7,
>>>>>> 4,
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>> ],
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
