>
> That's not perfectly correct.
>
> OSD.0/1/2 seem to be down.
Sorry but where do you see this? I think this indicates that they are up: osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs?
> Am 10.01.2017 um 07:50 schrieb Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Marcus Müller <mueller.marcus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> All osds are currently up:
>>
>> health HEALTH_WARN
>> 4 pgs stuck unclean
>> recovery 4482/58798254 objects degraded (0.008%)
>> recovery 420522/58798254 objects misplaced (0.715%)
>> noscrub,nodeep-scrub flag(s) set
>> monmap e9: 5 mons at
>> {ceph1=192.168.10.3:6789/0,ceph2=192.168.10.4:6789/0,ceph3=192.168.10.5:6789/0,ceph4=192.168.60.6:6789/0,ceph5=192.168.60.11:6789/0}
>> election epoch 478, quorum 0,1,2,3,4
>> ceph1,ceph2,ceph3,ceph4,ceph5
>> osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs
>> flags noscrub,nodeep-scrub
>> pgmap v9981077: 320 pgs, 3 pools, 4837 GB data, 19140 kobjects
>> 15070 GB used, 40801 GB / 55872 GB avail
>> 4482/58798254 objects degraded (0.008%)
>> 420522/58798254 objects misplaced (0.715%)
>> 316 active+clean
>> 4 active+remapped
>> client io 56601 B/s rd, 45619 B/s wr, 0 op/s
>>
>> This did not chance for two days or so.
>>
>>
>> By the way, my ceph osd df now looks like this:
>>
>> ID WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR
>> 0 1.28899 1.00000 3724G 1699G 2024G 45.63 1.69
>> 1 1.57899 1.00000 3724G 1708G 2015G 45.87 1.70
>> 2 1.68900 1.00000 3724G 1695G 2028G 45.54 1.69
>> 3 6.78499 1.00000 7450G 1241G 6208G 16.67 0.62
>> 4 8.39999 1.00000 7450G 1228G 6221G 16.49 0.61
>> 5 9.51500 1.00000 7450G 1239G 6210G 16.64 0.62
>> 6 7.66499 1.00000 7450G 1265G 6184G 16.99 0.63
>> 7 9.75499 1.00000 7450G 2497G 4952G 33.52 1.24
>> 8 9.32999 1.00000 7450G 2495G 4954G 33.49 1.24
>> TOTAL 55872G 15071G 40801G 26.97
>> MIN/MAX VAR: 0.61/1.70 STDDEV: 13.16
>>
>> As you can see, now osd2 also went down to 45% Use and „lost“ data. But I
>> also think this is no problem and ceph just clears everything up after
>> backfilling.
>>
>>
>> Am 10.01.2017 um 07:29 schrieb Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Looking at ``ceph -s`` you originally provided, all OSDs are up.
>>
>> osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs
>>
>>
>> But looking at ``pg query``, OSD.0 / 1 are not up. Are they something
>
> That's not perfectly correct.
>
> OSD.0/1/2 seem to be down.
>
>> like related to ?:
>>
>> Ceph1, ceph2 and ceph3 are vms on one physical host
>>
>>
>> Are those OSDs running on vm instances?
>>
>> # 9.7
>> <snip>
>>
>> "state": "active+remapped",
>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>> "epoch": 3114,
>> "up": [
>> 7,
>> 3
>> ],
>> "acting": [
>> 7,
>> 3,
>> 0
>> ],
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> # 7.84
>> <snip>
>>
>> "state": "active+remapped",
>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>> "epoch": 3114,
>> "up": [
>> 4,
>> 8
>> ],
>> "acting": [
>> 4,
>> 8,
>> 1
>> ],
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> # 8.1b
>> <snip>
>>
>> "state": "active+remapped",
>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>> "epoch": 3114,
>> "up": [
>> 4,
>> 7
>> ],
>> "acting": [
>> 4,
>> 7,
>> 2
>> ],
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> # 7.7a
>> <snip>
>>
>> "state": "active+remapped",
>> "snap_trimq": "[]",
>> "epoch": 3114,
>> "up": [
>> 7,
>> 4
>> ],
>> "acting": [
>> 7,
>> 4,
>> 2
>> ],
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
