On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Marcus Müller <mueller.marcus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All osds are currently up:
>
> health HEALTH_WARN
> 4 pgs stuck unclean
> recovery 4482/58798254 objects degraded (0.008%)
> recovery 420522/58798254 objects misplaced (0.715%)
> noscrub,nodeep-scrub flag(s) set
> monmap e9: 5 mons at
> {ceph1=192.168.10.3:6789/0,ceph2=192.168.10.4:6789/0,ceph3=192.168.10.5:6789/0,ceph4=192.168.60.6:6789/0,ceph5=192.168.60.11:6789/0}
> election epoch 478, quorum 0,1,2,3,4
> ceph1,ceph2,ceph3,ceph4,ceph5
> osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs
> flags noscrub,nodeep-scrub
> pgmap v9981077: 320 pgs, 3 pools, 4837 GB data, 19140 kobjects
> 15070 GB used, 40801 GB / 55872 GB avail
> 4482/58798254 objects degraded (0.008%)
> 420522/58798254 objects misplaced (0.715%)
> 316 active+clean
> 4 active+remapped
> client io 56601 B/s rd, 45619 B/s wr, 0 op/s
>
> This did not chance for two days or so.
>
>
> By the way, my ceph osd df now looks like this:
>
> ID WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR
> 0 1.28899 1.00000 3724G 1699G 2024G 45.63 1.69
> 1 1.57899 1.00000 3724G 1708G 2015G 45.87 1.70
> 2 1.68900 1.00000 3724G 1695G 2028G 45.54 1.69
> 3 6.78499 1.00000 7450G 1241G 6208G 16.67 0.62
> 4 8.39999 1.00000 7450G 1228G 6221G 16.49 0.61
> 5 9.51500 1.00000 7450G 1239G 6210G 16.64 0.62
> 6 7.66499 1.00000 7450G 1265G 6184G 16.99 0.63
> 7 9.75499 1.00000 7450G 2497G 4952G 33.52 1.24
> 8 9.32999 1.00000 7450G 2495G 4954G 33.49 1.24
> TOTAL 55872G 15071G 40801G 26.97
> MIN/MAX VAR: 0.61/1.70 STDDEV: 13.16
>
> As you can see, now osd2 also went down to 45% Use and „lost“ data. But I
> also think this is no problem and ceph just clears everything up after
> backfilling.
>
>
> Am 10.01.2017 um 07:29 schrieb Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Looking at ``ceph -s`` you originally provided, all OSDs are up.
>
> osdmap e3114: 9 osds: 9 up, 9 in; 4 remapped pgs
>
>
> But looking at ``pg query``, OSD.0 / 1 are not up. Are they something
That's not perfectly correct.
OSD.0/1/2 seem to be down.
> like related to ?:
>
> Ceph1, ceph2 and ceph3 are vms on one physical host
>
>
> Are those OSDs running on vm instances?
>
> # 9.7
> <snip>
>
> "state": "active+remapped",
> "snap_trimq": "[]",
> "epoch": 3114,
> "up": [
> 7,
> 3
> ],
> "acting": [
> 7,
> 3,
> 0
> ],
>
> <snip>
>
> # 7.84
> <snip>
>
> "state": "active+remapped",
> "snap_trimq": "[]",
> "epoch": 3114,
> "up": [
> 4,
> 8
> ],
> "acting": [
> 4,
> 8,
> 1
> ],
>
> <snip>
>
> # 8.1b
> <snip>
>
> "state": "active+remapped",
> "snap_trimq": "[]",
> "epoch": 3114,
> "up": [
> 4,
> 7
> ],
> "acting": [
> 4,
> 7,
> 2
> ],
>
> <snip>
>
> # 7.7a
> <snip>
>
> "state": "active+remapped",
> "snap_trimq": "[]",
> "epoch": 3114,
> "up": [
> 7,
> 4
> ],
> "acting": [
> 7,
> 4,
> 2
> ],
>
> <snip>
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
