On 10/24/2016 03:10 AM, Christian Balzer wrote: [...] > There are several items here and I very much would welcome a response from > a Ceph/RH representative. > > 1. Is that depreciation only in regards to RHCS, as Nick seems to hope? > Because I very much doubt that, why develop code you just "removed" from > your milk cow? > > 2. Is that the same kind of depreciation as with the format 1 RBD images, > as in, will there be a 5 year window where this functionality is NOT > removed from the code base and a clear, seamless and non-disruptive > upgrade path? > Let me add one more point: How will this affect situations in which one has cephfs on EC pools (which demand a cache tier in front)? Dietmar -- _________________________________________ D i e t m a r R i e d e r, Mag.Dr. Innsbruck Medical University Biocenter - Division for Bioinformatics Innrain 80, 6020 Innsbruck Phone: +43 512 9003 71402 Fax: +43 512 9003 73100 Email: dietmar.rieder@xxxxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.icbi.at
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
