Randy, are you using ceph-fuse or the kernel client (or something else)? On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Randy Orr <randy.orr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Great, thank you. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance in > testing or validating a fix. > > -Randy > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> Hello Randy, >> >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Randy Orr <randy.orr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > mds/Locker.cc: In function 'bool Locker::check_inode_max_size(CInode*, >> > bool, >> > bool, uint64_t, bool, uint64_t, utime_t)' thread 7fc305b83700 time >> > 2016-08-09 18:51:50.626630 >> > mds/Locker.cc: 2190: FAILED assert(in->is_file()) >> > >> > ceph version 10.2.1 (3a66dd4f30852819c1bdaa8ec23c795d4ad77269) >> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char >> > const*)+0x8b) [0x563d1e0a2d3b] >> > 2: (Locker::check_inode_max_size(CInode*, bool, bool, unsigned long, >> > bool, >> > unsigned long, utime_t)+0x15e3) [0x563d1de506a3] >> > 3: (Server::handle_client_open(std::shared_ptr<MDRequestImpl>&)+0x1061) >> > [0x563d1dd386a1] >> > 4: >> > (Server::dispatch_client_request(std::shared_ptr<MDRequestImpl>&)+0xa0b) >> > [0x563d1dd5709b] >> > 5: (Server::handle_client_request(MClientRequest*)+0x47f) >> > [0x563d1dd5768f] >> > 6: (Server::dispatch(Message*)+0x3bb) [0x563d1dd5b8db] >> > 7: (MDSRank::handle_deferrable_message(Message*)+0x80c) >> > [0x563d1dce1f8c] >> > 8: (MDSRank::_dispatch(Message*, bool)+0x1e1) [0x563d1dceb081] >> > 9: (MDSRankDispatcher::ms_dispatch(Message*)+0x15) [0x563d1dcec1d5] >> > 10: (MDSDaemon::ms_dispatch(Message*)+0xc3) [0x563d1dcd3f83] >> > 11: (DispatchQueue::entry()+0x78b) [0x563d1e1996cb] >> > 12: (DispatchQueue::DispatchThread::entry()+0xd) [0x563d1e08862d] >> > 13: (()+0x8184) [0x7fc30bd7c184] >> > 14: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fc30a2d337d] >> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is >> > needed to >> > interpret this. >> >> I have a bug report filed for this issue: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16983 >> >> I believe it should be straightforward to solve and we'll have a fix >> for it soon. >> >> Thanks for the report! >> >> -- >> Patrick Donnelly > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Patrick Donnelly _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |