Patrick,
We are using the kernel client. We have a mix of 4.4 and 3.19 kernels on the client side with plans to move away from the 3.19 kernel where/when we can.
-Randy
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Randy, are you using ceph-fuse or the kernel client (or something else)?
> ______________________________
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Randy Orr <randy.orr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Great, thank you. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance in
> testing or validating a fix.
>
> -Randy
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Randy,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Randy Orr <randy.orr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > mds/Locker.cc: In function 'bool Locker::check_inode_max_size(CInode*,
>> > bool,
>> > bool, uint64_t, bool, uint64_t, utime_t)' thread 7fc305b83700 time
>> > 2016-08-09 18:51:50.626630
>> > mds/Locker.cc: 2190: FAILED assert(in->is_file())
>> >
>> > ceph version 10.2.1 (3a66dd4f30852819c1bdaa8ec23c79 5d4ad77269)
>> > 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char
>> > const*)+0x8b) [0x563d1e0a2d3b]
>> > 2: (Locker::check_inode_max_size(CInode*, bool, bool, unsigned long,
>> > bool,
>> > unsigned long, utime_t)+0x15e3) [0x563d1de506a3]
>> > 3: (Server::handle_client_open(std::shared_ptr<MDRequestImpl> &)+0x1061)
>> > [0x563d1dd386a1]
>> > 4:
>> > (Server::dispatch_client_request(std::shared_ptr< MDRequestImpl>&)+0xa0b)
>> > [0x563d1dd5709b]
>> > 5: (Server::handle_client_request(MClientRequest*)+ 0x47f)
>> > [0x563d1dd5768f]
>> > 6: (Server::dispatch(Message*)+0x3bb) [0x563d1dd5b8db]
>> > 7: (MDSRank::handle_deferrable_message(Message*)+0x80c)
>> > [0x563d1dce1f8c]
>> > 8: (MDSRank::_dispatch(Message*, bool)+0x1e1) [0x563d1dceb081]
>> > 9: (MDSRankDispatcher::ms_dispatch(Message*)+0x15) [0x563d1dcec1d5]
>> > 10: (MDSDaemon::ms_dispatch(Message*)+0xc3) [0x563d1dcd3f83]
>> > 11: (DispatchQueue::entry()+0x78b) [0x563d1e1996cb]
>> > 12: (DispatchQueue::DispatchThread::entry()+0xd) [0x563d1e08862d]
>> > 13: (()+0x8184) [0x7fc30bd7c184]
>> > 14: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fc30a2d337d]
>> > NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is
>> > needed to
>> > interpret this.
>>
>> I have a bug report filed for this issue:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16983
>>
>> I believe it should be straightforward to solve and we'll have a fix
>> for it soon.
>>
>> Thanks for the report!
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Donnelly
>
>
>
_________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph. com
>
--
Patrick Donnelly
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
