please share the "ceph osd tree" output.
Is the osd.140 filled above 80%?
if not, try to restart and see.
Thanks
Swami
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Vincent Godin <vince.mlist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I restart osd.80 and till now : no bakfill_toofull anymore
>
> 2016-07-25 17:46 GMT+02:00 M Ranga Swami Reddy <swamireddy@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> can you restart osd.80 and check see, if the recovery procced?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Swami
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Vincent Godin <vince.mlist@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm facing this problem. The cluster is in Hammer 0.94.5
>> >
>> > When i do a ceph health detail, i can see :
>> >
>> > pg 8.c1 is stuck unclean for 21691.555742, current state
>> > active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull, last
>> > acting [140]
>> > pg 8.c1 is stuck undersized for 21327.027365, current state
>> > active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull, last
>> > acting [140]
>> > pg 8.c1 is stuck degraded for 21327.035186, current state
>> > active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull, last
>> > acting [140]
>> > pg 8.c1 is
>> > active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull,
>> > acting
>> > [140]
>> >
>> > If I query the pg 8.c1, the recovery section gives :
>> >
>> > "recovery_state": [
>> > {
>> > "name": "Started\/Primary\/Active",
>> > "enter_time": "2016-07-25 11:24:48.658971",
>> > "might_have_unfound": [],
>> > "recovery_progress": {
>> > "backfill_targets": [
>> > "80",
>> > "151"
>> > ],
>> > "waiting_on_backfill": [],
>> > "last_backfill_started": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
>> > "backfill_info": {
>> > "begin": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
>> > "end": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
>> > "objects": []
>> > },
>> > "peer_backfill_info": [],
>> > "backfills_in_flight": [],
>> > "recovering": [],
>> > "pg_backend": {
>> > "pull_from_peer": [],
>> > "pushing": []
>> > }
>> > },
>> >
>> > The problem is when i do a "ceph osd df" on osd 80 or 151, i can see
>> > that
>> > osd 80 is used at 16.19% and osd 151 at 81.98% (osd80 to osd99 are
>> > recovering so that's why they are so empty)
>> >
>> > If i look for the backfill_full_ration of these two osds, i found 0.85
>> > for
>> > both of them
>> >
>> > So why the pg is in backfill_toofull state ?
>> >
>> > Thanks for your help
>> >
>> > Vincent
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
