Re: 1 active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



can you restart osd.80 and check see, if the recovery procced?

Thanks
Swami

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Vincent Godin <vince.mlist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing this problem. The cluster is in Hammer 0.94.5
>
> When i do a ceph health detail, i can see :
>
> pg 8.c1 is stuck unclean for 21691.555742, current state
> active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull, last
> acting [140]
> pg 8.c1 is stuck undersized for 21327.027365, current state
> active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull, last
> acting [140]
> pg 8.c1 is stuck degraded for 21327.035186, current state
> active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull, last
> acting [140]
> pg 8.c1 is
> active+undersized+degraded+remapped+wait_backfill+backfill_toofull, acting
> [140]
>
> If I query the pg 8.c1, the recovery section gives :
>
>  "recovery_state": [
>         {
>             "name": "Started\/Primary\/Active",
>             "enter_time": "2016-07-25 11:24:48.658971",
>             "might_have_unfound": [],
>             "recovery_progress": {
>                 "backfill_targets": [
>                     "80",
>                     "151"
>                 ],
>                 "waiting_on_backfill": [],
>                 "last_backfill_started": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
>                 "backfill_info": {
>                     "begin": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
>                     "end": "0\/\/0\/\/-1",
>                     "objects": []
>                 },
>                 "peer_backfill_info": [],
>                 "backfills_in_flight": [],
>                 "recovering": [],
>                 "pg_backend": {
>                     "pull_from_peer": [],
>                     "pushing": []
>                 }
>             },
>
> The problem is when i do a "ceph osd df" on osd 80 or 151, i can see that
> osd 80 is used at 16.19% and osd 151 at 81.98% (osd80 to osd99 are
> recovering so that's why they are so empty)
>
> If i look for the backfill_full_ration of these two osds, i found 0.85 for
> both of them
>
> So why the pg is in backfill_toofull state ?
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Vincent
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux