Oh, for the pg with unfound objects, restart the primary, that should fix it. -Sam On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Resent to ceph-users to be under the message size limit.... > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> OK, this is done and I've observed the state change of 70.459 from >> active+clean to active+clean+inconsistent after the first scrub. >> >> Files attached: bash script of commands (setuposddebug.bash), log script >> from the script (setuposddebug.log), three pg queries, one at the start, one >> at the end of the first scrub, one at the end of the second scrub. >> >> At this point, I now have 27 active+clean+inconsistent PGs. While I'm >> not too concerned about how they are labeled, clients cannot extract objects >> which are in the PGs and are labeled as unfound. Its important for us to >> maintain user confidence in the system so I need a fix as soon as >> possible...... >> >> The log files from the OSDs are here: >> >> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bzz8TrxFvfembkt2XzlCZFVJZFU >> >> Thanks, >> Jeff >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Yep, just as before. Actually, do it twice (wait for 'scrubbing' to >>> go away each time). >>> -Sam >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> > Just to be sure I grab what you need: >>> > >>> > 1- set debug logs for the pg 70.459 >>> > 2 - Issue a deep-scrub ceph pg deep-scrub 70.459 >>> > 3- stop once the 70.459 pg goes inconsistent? >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Jeff >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hmm, I'll look into this a bit more tomorrow. Can you get the tree >>> >> structure of the 70.459 pg directory on osd.307 (find . will do fine). >>> >> -Sam >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > 307 is on ceph03. >>> >> > Jeff >>> >> > >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Which node is osd.307 on? >>> >> >> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> > ' I didn't see the errors in the tracker on the new nodes, but >>> >> >> > they >>> >> >> > were only receiving new data, not migrating it.' -- What do you >>> >> >> > mean >>> >> >> > by that? >>> >> >> > -Sam >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> > <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >> The filesystem is xfs everywhere, there are nine hosts. The >>> >> >> >> two >>> >> >> >> new >>> >> >> >> ceph >>> >> >> >> nodes 08, 09 have a new kernel. I didn't see the errors in >>> >> >> >> the >>> >> >> >> tracker on >>> >> >> >> the new nodes, but they were only receiving new data, not >>> >> >> >> migrating >>> >> >> >> it. >>> >> >> >> Jeff >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> ceph2: Linux ceph2 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC >>> >> >> >> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph1: Linux ceph1 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC >>> >> >> >> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph3: Linux ceph3 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC >>> >> >> >> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph03: Linux ceph03 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph01: Linux ceph01 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph02: Linux ceph02 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph06: Linux ceph06 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph05: Linux ceph05 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph04: Linux ceph04 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph08: Linux ceph08 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP >>> >> >> >> Fri >>> >> >> >> Feb >>> >> >> >> 26 >>> >> >> >> 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph07: Linux ceph07 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >>> >> >> >> 22:08:27 >>> >> >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> ceph09: Linux ceph09 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP >>> >> >> >> Fri >>> >> >> >> Feb >>> >> >> >> 26 >>> >> >> >> 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> What filesystem and kernel are you running on the osds? This >>> >> >> >>> (and >>> >> >> >>> your other bug, actually) could be explained by some kind of >>> >> >> >>> weird >>> >> >> >>> kernel readdir behavior. >>> >> >> >>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> > Hmm, so much for that theory, still looking. If you can >>> >> >> >>> > produce >>> >> >> >>> > another set of logs (as before) from scrubbing that pg, it >>> >> >> >>> > might >>> >> >> >>> > help. >>> >> >> >>> > -Sam >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>> > <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> they're all the same.....see attached. >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Have you confirmed the versions? >>> >> >> >>> >>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> > I have one other very strange event happening, I've >>> >> >> >>> >>> > opened a >>> >> >> >>> >>> > ticket >>> >> >> >>> >>> > on >>> >> >> >>> >>> > it: >>> >> >> >>> >>> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14766 >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > During this migration, OSD failed probably over 400 times >>> >> >> >>> >>> > while >>> >> >> >>> >>> > moving >>> >> >> >>> >>> > data >>> >> >> >>> >>> > around. We move the empty directories and restarted the >>> >> >> >>> >>> > OSDs. >>> >> >> >>> >>> > I >>> >> >> >>> >>> > can't >>> >> >> >>> >>> > say if this is related--I have no reason to suspect it >>> >> >> >>> >>> > is. >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > Jeff >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Shinobu Kinjo >>> >> >> >>> >>> > <shinobu.kj@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> What could cause this kind of unexpected behaviour? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Any assumption?? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Sorry for interrupting you. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Cheers, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> S >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Hmm, at the end of the log, the pg is still >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > inconsistent. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Can >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > you >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > attach a ceph pg query on that pg? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> If so, that strongly suggests that the pg was >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> actually >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> never >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> inconsistent in the first place and that the bug is >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> in >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> scrub >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> itself >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> presumably getting confused about an object during a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> write. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> The >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> next >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> step would be to get logs like the above from a pg as >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> it >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> scrubs >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> transitioning from clean to inconsistent. If it's >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> really >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> race >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> between scrub and a write, it's probably just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> non-deterministic, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> you >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> could set logging on a set of osds and continuously >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> scrub >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> any >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> pgs >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> which only map to those osds until you reproduce the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> problem. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> So after the scrub, it came up clean? The >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> inconsistent/missing >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> objects reappeared? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Hi Sam, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> I've done as you requested: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # for i in 307 210 273 191 132 450 ; do >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> ceph tell osd.$i injectargs '--debug-osd 20 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> --debug-filestore 20 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> --debug-ms 1' >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> done >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # date >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:03:38 CST 2016 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg deep-scrub 70.459 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> instructing pg 70.459 on osd.307 to deep-scrub >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Scrub finished around >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # date >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:13:03 CST 2016 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> I've tar'd+gziped the files which can be downloaded >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> from >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> here. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> The >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> logs >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> start a minute or two after today at 16:00. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bzz8TrxFvfema2NQUmotd1BOTnM&usp=sharing >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Oddly(to me anyways), this pg is now active+clean: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg dump | grep 70.459 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> dumped all in format plain >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 70.459 21377 0 0 0 0 64515446306 3088 3088 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> active+clean >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 2016-03-07 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 16:26:57.796537 279563'212832 279602:628151 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 307 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] 307 279563'212832 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 2016-03-07 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 16:12:30.741984 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 279563'212832 2016-03-07 16:12:30.741984 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Regards, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Jeff >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> I think the unfound object on repair is fixed by >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> d51806f5b330d5f112281fbb95ea6addf994324e (not in >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> hammer >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> yet). >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> I >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> opened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15002 for >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> backport >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> and >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> to >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> make sure it's covered in ceph-qa-suite. No idea >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> at >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> this >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> time >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> why >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> objects are disappearing though. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > The one just scrubbed and now inconsistent. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Do you want me to enable this for the pg >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> already >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> with >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> unfound >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> objects >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> or the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> placement group just scrubbed and now >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> inconsistent? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeff >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Samuel Just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Can you enable >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug osd = 20 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug filestore = 20 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug ms = 1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> on all osds in that PG, rescrub, and convey to >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> us >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> resulting >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> logs? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> -Sam >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeffrey >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> McDonald >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Here is a PG which just went inconsistent: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > acting >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > [307,210,273,191,132,450] >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Attached is the result of a pg query on >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > this. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > I >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > will >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > wait >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > for your >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > feedback before issuing a repair. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > From what I read, the inconsistencies are >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > more >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > likely >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > result of >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ntp, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > but >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > all nodes have the local ntp master and all >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > are >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > showing >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > sync. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Regards, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeff >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Gregory >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Farnum >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> [ Keeping this on the users list. ] >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Okay, so next time this happens you >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> probably >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> want >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> to >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> do a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> pg >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> query >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> on >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> the PG which has been reported as dirty. I >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> can't >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> help >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> much >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> beyond >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> that, but hopefully Kefu or David will >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> chime in >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> once >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> there's >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> little >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> more for them to look at. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> -Greg >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jeffrey >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> McDonald >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Hi Greg, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > I'm running the ceph version hammer, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > ceph version 0.94.5 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > (9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > The hardware migration was performed by >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > setting >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > crush >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > map to >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > zero >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > for the OSD we wanted to retire. The >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > system >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > was >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > performing >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > poorly >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > with >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > these older OSDs and we had a difficult >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > time >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > maintaining >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > stability of >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > system. The old OSDs are still there >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > but >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > all >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > of >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > data >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > is >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > now >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > migrated >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > to new and/or existing hardware. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeff >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Gregory >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Farnum >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Jeffrey >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> McDonald >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Hi, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > For a while, we've been seeing >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > inconsistent >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > placement >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > groups >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > on >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > our >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > erasure >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > coded system. The placement groups >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > go >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > from >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > of >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean+inconsistent after a deep >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > scrub: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044131 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub stat mismatch, got >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044416 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub 18 missing, 0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > inconsistent >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044464 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 deep-scrub 73 errors >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > So I tell the placement group to >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > perform a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > repair: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:26.047177 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f385d118700 0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [INF] : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair starts >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:57.087291 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f3858b0a700 0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.2:6874/13937 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.6:6824/8127 pipe(0x2e578000 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > sd=697 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > :6874 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The repair finds missing shards and >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > repairs >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > them, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > but >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > then I >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > have >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 'unfound objects' : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.467590 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair stat mismatch, got >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.468358 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair 18 missing, 0 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > inconsistent >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.469431 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 7f385d118700 -1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair 73 errors, 73 fixed >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've traced one of the unfound objects >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > all >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > way >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > through the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've found that they are not really >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > lost. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > can >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > fail >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > over >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > osd >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recover the files. This is happening >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > quite >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > regularly >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > after a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > large >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > migration of data from old hardware to >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > new(migration >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > is >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > complete). >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The system sets the PG into >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 'recovery', >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > but >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we've >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > seen >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > in >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > a >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recovering state for many days. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Should >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > just >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > be >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > patient >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or do >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > need >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to dig further into the issue? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> You may need to dig into this more, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> although >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> I'm >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> not >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> sure >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> what >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> the >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> issue is likely to be. What version of >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> Ceph >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> are >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> you >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> running? How >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> did >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> you do this hardware migration? >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> -Greg >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is stuck unclean for >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 704.803040, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > current >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+recovering, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > last acting [277,101,218,49,304,412] >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is active+recovering, acting >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [277,101,218,49,304,412], >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > unfound >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > There is no indication of any problems >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > with >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > down >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > network >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > issues >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > with >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs. >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Thanks, >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeff >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users mailing list >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > ceph-users mailing list >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Email: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> shinobu@xxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> GitHub: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> shinobu-x >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Blog: >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Life with Distributed Computational System based on >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> OpenSource >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > -- >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>> >>> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >>> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >>> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >>> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >>> >> 599 Walter Library email: >>> >> >> >>> >> jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >>> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >>> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> -- >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> >> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> >> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> >> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> >> >> 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> >> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> >> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > >>> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> >> > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >>> > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >>> > >>> > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >> > > > > -- > > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > Assistant Director for HPC Operations > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > University of Minnesota Twin Cities > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |