Hmm, I'll look into this a bit more tomorrow. Can you get the tree structure of the 70.459 pg directory on osd.307 (find . will do fine). -Sam On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> wrote: > 307 is on ceph03. > Jeff > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Which node is osd.307 on? >> -Sam >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > ' I didn't see the errors in the tracker on the new nodes, but they >> > were only receiving new data, not migrating it.' -- What do you mean >> > by that? >> > -Sam >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> > wrote: >> >> The filesystem is xfs everywhere, there are nine hosts. The two new >> >> ceph >> >> nodes 08, 09 have a new kernel. I didn't see the errors in the >> >> tracker on >> >> the new nodes, but they were only receiving new data, not migrating it. >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> ceph2: Linux ceph2 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 >> >> UTC >> >> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph1: Linux ceph1 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 >> >> UTC >> >> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph3: Linux ceph3 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 >> >> UTC >> >> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph03: Linux ceph03 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >> >> 22:08:27 >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph01: Linux ceph01 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >> >> 22:08:27 >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph02: Linux ceph02 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >> >> 22:08:27 >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph06: Linux ceph06 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >> >> 22:08:27 >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph05: Linux ceph05 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >> >> 22:08:27 >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph04: Linux ceph04 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >> >> 22:08:27 >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph08: Linux ceph08 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb >> >> 26 >> >> 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph07: Linux ceph07 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 >> >> 22:08:27 >> >> UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> ceph09: Linux ceph09 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb >> >> 26 >> >> 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> What filesystem and kernel are you running on the osds? This (and >> >>> your other bug, actually) could be explained by some kind of weird >> >>> kernel readdir behavior. >> >>> -Sam >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> > Hmm, so much for that theory, still looking. If you can produce >> >>> > another set of logs (as before) from scrubbing that pg, it might >> >>> > help. >> >>> > -Sam >> >>> > >> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> they're all the same.....see attached. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Have you confirmed the versions? >> >>> >>> -Sam >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> > I have one other very strange event happening, I've opened a >> >>> >>> > ticket >> >>> >>> > on >> >>> >>> > it: >> >>> >>> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14766 >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > During this migration, OSD failed probably over 400 times while >> >>> >>> > moving >> >>> >>> > data >> >>> >>> > around. We move the empty directories and restarted the OSDs. >> >>> >>> > I >> >>> >>> > can't >> >>> >>> > say if this is related--I have no reason to suspect it is. >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > Jeff >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Shinobu Kinjo >> >>> >>> > <shinobu.kj@xxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> What could cause this kind of unexpected behaviour? >> >>> >>> >> Any assumption?? >> >>> >>> >> Sorry for interrupting you. >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Cheers, >> >>> >>> >> S >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> > Hmm, at the end of the log, the pg is still inconsistent. >> >>> >>> >> > Can >> >>> >>> >> > you >> >>> >>> >> > attach a ceph pg query on that pg? >> >>> >>> >> > -Sam >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Samuel Just >> >>> >>> >> > <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >> If so, that strongly suggests that the pg was actually never >> >>> >>> >> >> inconsistent in the first place and that the bug is in scrub >> >>> >>> >> >> itself >> >>> >>> >> >> presumably getting confused about an object during a write. >> >>> >>> >> >> The >> >>> >>> >> >> next >> >>> >>> >> >> step would be to get logs like the above from a pg as it >> >>> >>> >> >> scrubs >> >>> >>> >> >> transitioning from clean to inconsistent. If it's really a >> >>> >>> >> >> race >> >>> >>> >> >> between scrub and a write, it's probably just >> >>> >>> >> >> non-deterministic, >> >>> >>> >> >> you >> >>> >>> >> >> could set logging on a set of osds and continuously scrub >> >>> >>> >> >> any >> >>> >>> >> >> pgs >> >>> >>> >> >> which only map to those osds until you reproduce the >> >>> >>> >> >> problem. >> >>> >>> >> >> -Sam >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Samuel Just >> >>> >>> >> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> So after the scrub, it came up clean? The >> >>> >>> >> >>> inconsistent/missing >> >>> >>> >> >>> objects reappeared? >> >>> >>> >> >>> -Sam >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >>> >> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Hi Sam, >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> I've done as you requested: >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting >> >>> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # for i in 307 210 273 191 132 450 ; do >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> ceph tell osd.$i injectargs '--debug-osd 20 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> --debug-filestore 20 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> --debug-ms 1' >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> done >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # date >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:03:38 CST 2016 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg deep-scrub 70.459 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> instructing pg 70.459 on osd.307 to deep-scrub >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Scrub finished around >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # date >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:13:03 CST 2016 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> I've tar'd+gziped the files which can be downloaded from >> >>> >>> >> >>>> here. >> >>> >>> >> >>>> The >> >>> >>> >> >>>> logs >> >>> >>> >> >>>> start a minute or two after today at 16:00. >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bzz8TrxFvfema2NQUmotd1BOTnM&usp=sharing >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Oddly(to me anyways), this pg is now active+clean: >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg dump | grep 70.459 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> dumped all in format plain >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 70.459 21377 0 0 0 0 64515446306 3088 3088 active+clean >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 2016-03-07 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 16:26:57.796537 279563'212832 279602:628151 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 307 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] 307 279563'212832 2016-03-07 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 16:12:30.741984 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 279563'212832 2016-03-07 16:12:30.741984 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Regards, >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Jeff >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Samuel Just >> >>> >>> >> >>>> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> I think the unfound object on repair is fixed by >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> d51806f5b330d5f112281fbb95ea6addf994324e (not in hammer >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> yet). >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> I >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> opened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15002 for the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> backport >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> and >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> to >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> make sure it's covered in ceph-qa-suite. No idea at this >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> time >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> why >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> objects are disappearing though. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> -Sam >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Just >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > The one just scrubbed and now inconsistent. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > -Sam >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Do you want me to enable this for the pg already with >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> unfound >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> objects >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> or the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> placement group just scrubbed and now inconsistent? >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeff >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Samuel Just >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Can you enable >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug osd = 20 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug filestore = 20 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug ms = 1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> on all osds in that PG, rescrub, and convey to us the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> resulting >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> logs? >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> -Sam >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Here is a PG which just went inconsistent: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > [307,210,273,191,132,450] >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Attached is the result of a pg query on this. I >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > will >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > wait >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > for your >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > feedback before issuing a repair. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > From what I read, the inconsistencies are more >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > likely >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > result of >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ntp, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > but >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > all nodes have the local ntp master and all are >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > showing >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > sync. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Regards, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeff >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Gregory Farnum >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> [ Keeping this on the users list. ] >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Okay, so next time this happens you probably want >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> to >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> do a >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> pg >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> query >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> on >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> the PG which has been reported as dirty. I can't >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> help >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> much >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> beyond >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> that, but hopefully Kefu or David will chime in >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> once >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> there's >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> a >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> little >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> more for them to look at. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> -Greg >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Hi Greg, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > I'm running the ceph version hammer, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > ceph version 0.94.5 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > (9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > The hardware migration was performed by just >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > setting >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > crush >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > map to >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > zero >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > for the OSD we wanted to retire. The system >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > was >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > performing >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > poorly >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > with >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > these older OSDs and we had a difficult time >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > maintaining >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > stability of >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > system. The old OSDs are still there but all >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > of >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > data >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > is >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > now >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > migrated >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > to new and/or existing hardware. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeff >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Gregory Farnum >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Jeffrey >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> McDonald >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Hi, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > For a while, we've been seeing inconsistent >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > placement >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > groups >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > on >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > our >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > erasure >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > coded system. The placement groups go from >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > a >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > of >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean+inconsistent after a deep scrub: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044131 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub stat mismatch, got >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044416 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub 18 missing, 0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > inconsistent >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044464 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 deep-scrub 73 errors >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > So I tell the placement group to perform a >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > repair: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:26.047177 7f385d118700 0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [INF] : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair starts >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:57.087291 7f3858b0a700 0 -- >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.2:6874/13937 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.6:6824/8127 pipe(0x2e578000 sd=697 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > :6874 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The repair finds missing shards and repairs >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > them, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > but >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > then I >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > have >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 'unfound objects' : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.467590 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair stat mismatch, got >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > hit_set_archive >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.468358 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair 18 missing, 0 inconsistent >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.469431 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair 73 errors, 73 fixed >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've traced one of the unfound objects all >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > way >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > through the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've found that they are not really lost. I >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > can >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > fail >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > over >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > osd >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recover the files. This is happening quite >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > regularly >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > after a >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > large >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > migration of data from old hardware to >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > new(migration >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > is >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > complete). >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The system sets the PG into 'recovery', but >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we've >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > seen >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > in >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > a >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recovering state for many days. Should we >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > just >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > be >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > patient >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or do >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > need >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to dig further into the issue? >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> You may need to dig into this more, although >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> I'm >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> not >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> sure >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> what >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> the >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> issue is likely to be. What version of Ceph are >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> you >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> running? How >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> did >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> you do this hardware migration? >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> -Greg >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is stuck unclean for 704.803040, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > current >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+recovering, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > last acting [277,101,218,49,304,412] >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is active+recovering, acting >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [277,101,218,49,304,412], >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > unfound >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > There is no indication of any problems with >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > down >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > network >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > issues >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > with >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs. >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Thanks, >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeff >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > -- >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 625-6905 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 624-8861 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 625-6905 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 624-8861 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > -- >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users mailing list >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> -- >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> -- >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >>> >> >>>> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >>> >> >>>> jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> >>>> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >>> >> > ceph-users mailing list >> >>> >>> >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> -- >> >>> >>> >> Email: >> >>> >>> >> shinobu@xxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> >> GitHub: >> >>> >>> >> shinobu-x >> >>> >>> >> Blog: >> >>> >>> >> Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > -- >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >> 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >> 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- > > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > Assistant Director for HPC Operations > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > University of Minnesota Twin Cities > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |