' I didn't see the errors in the tracker on the new nodes, but they were only receiving new data, not migrating it.' -- What do you mean by that? -Sam On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> wrote: > The filesystem is xfs everywhere, there are nine hosts. The two new ceph > nodes 08, 09 have a new kernel. I didn't see the errors in the tracker on > the new nodes, but they were only receiving new data, not migrating it. > Jeff > > ceph2: Linux ceph2 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC > 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph1: Linux ceph1 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC > 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph3: Linux ceph3 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC > 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph03: Linux ceph03 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph01: Linux ceph01 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph02: Linux ceph02 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph06: Linux ceph06 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph05: Linux ceph05 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph04: Linux ceph04 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph08: Linux ceph08 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 26 > 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph07: Linux ceph07 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 > UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > ceph09: Linux ceph09 3.19.0-51-generic #58~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 26 > 22:02:58 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> What filesystem and kernel are you running on the osds? This (and >> your other bug, actually) could be explained by some kind of weird >> kernel readdir behavior. >> -Sam >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hmm, so much for that theory, still looking. If you can produce >> > another set of logs (as before) from scrubbing that pg, it might help. >> > -Sam >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> > wrote: >> >> they're all the same.....see attached. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Have you confirmed the versions? >> >>> -Sam >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Jeffrey McDonald <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > I have one other very strange event happening, I've opened a ticket >> >>> > on >> >>> > it: >> >>> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14766 >> >>> > >> >>> > During this migration, OSD failed probably over 400 times while >> >>> > moving >> >>> > data >> >>> > around. We move the empty directories and restarted the OSDs. I >> >>> > can't >> >>> > say if this is related--I have no reason to suspect it is. >> >>> > >> >>> > Jeff >> >>> > >> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu.kj@xxxxxxxxx> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> What could cause this kind of unexpected behaviour? >> >>> >> Any assumption?? >> >>> >> Sorry for interrupting you. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Cheers, >> >>> >> S >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > Hmm, at the end of the log, the pg is still inconsistent. Can >> >>> >> > you >> >>> >> > attach a ceph pg query on that pg? >> >>> >> > -Sam >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> If so, that strongly suggests that the pg was actually never >> >>> >> >> inconsistent in the first place and that the bug is in scrub >> >>> >> >> itself >> >>> >> >> presumably getting confused about an object during a write. The >> >>> >> >> next >> >>> >> >> step would be to get logs like the above from a pg as it scrubs >> >>> >> >> transitioning from clean to inconsistent. If it's really a race >> >>> >> >> between scrub and a write, it's probably just non-deterministic, >> >>> >> >> you >> >>> >> >> could set logging on a set of osds and continuously scrub any >> >>> >> >> pgs >> >>> >> >> which only map to those osds until you reproduce the problem. >> >>> >> >> -Sam >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> So after the scrub, it came up clean? The inconsistent/missing >> >>> >> >>> objects reappeared? >> >>> >> >>> -Sam >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi Sam, >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> I've done as you requested: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting >> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> # for i in 307 210 273 191 132 450 ; do >> >>> >> >>>>> ceph tell osd.$i injectargs '--debug-osd 20 >> >>> >> >>>>> --debug-filestore 20 >> >>> >> >>>>> --debug-ms 1' >> >>> >> >>>>> done >> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >> >>>> debug_osd=20/20 debug_filestore=20/20 debug_ms=1/1 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> # date >> >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:03:38 CST 2016 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg deep-scrub 70.459 >> >>> >> >>>> instructing pg 70.459 on osd.307 to deep-scrub >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Scrub finished around >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> # date >> >>> >> >>>> Mon Mar 7 16:13:03 CST 2016 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> I've tar'd+gziped the files which can be downloaded from here. >> >>> >> >>>> The >> >>> >> >>>> logs >> >>> >> >>>> start a minute or two after today at 16:00. >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0Bzz8TrxFvfema2NQUmotd1BOTnM&usp=sharing >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Oddly(to me anyways), this pg is now active+clean: >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> # ceph pg dump | grep 70.459 >> >>> >> >>>> dumped all in format plain >> >>> >> >>>> 70.459 21377 0 0 0 0 64515446306 3088 3088 active+clean >> >>> >> >>>> 2016-03-07 >> >>> >> >>>> 16:26:57.796537 279563'212832 279602:628151 >> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] >> >>> >> >>>> 307 >> >>> >> >>>> [307,210,273,191,132,450] 307 279563'212832 2016-03-07 >> >>> >> >>>> 16:12:30.741984 >> >>> >> >>>> 279563'212832 2016-03-07 16:12:30.741984 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Regards, >> >>> >> >>>> Jeff >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> I think the unfound object on repair is fixed by >> >>> >> >>>>> d51806f5b330d5f112281fbb95ea6addf994324e (not in hammer yet). >> >>> >> >>>>> I >> >>> >> >>>>> opened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15002 for the backport >> >>> >> >>>>> and >> >>> >> >>>>> to >> >>> >> >>>>> make sure it's covered in ceph-qa-suite. No idea at this >> >>> >> >>>>> time >> >>> >> >>>>> why >> >>> >> >>>>> the >> >>> >> >>>>> objects are disappearing though. >> >>> >> >>>>> -Sam >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Just >> >>> >> >>>>> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> > The one just scrubbed and now inconsistent. >> >>> >> >>>>> > -Sam >> >>> >> >>>>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >> >>>>> > <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >> Do you want me to enable this for the pg already with >> >>> >> >>>>> >> unfound >> >>> >> >>>>> >> objects >> >>> >> >>>>> >> or the >> >>> >> >>>>> >> placement group just scrubbed and now inconsistent? >> >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeff >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Samuel Just >> >>> >> >>>>> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Can you enable >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug osd = 20 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug filestore = 20 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> debug ms = 1 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> on all osds in that PG, rescrub, and convey to us the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> resulting >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> logs? >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> -Sam >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Here is a PG which just went inconsistent: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > pg 70.459 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > [307,210,273,191,132,450] >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Attached is the result of a pg query on this. I will >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > wait >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > for your >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > feedback before issuing a repair. >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > From what I read, the inconsistencies are more likely >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > result of >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ntp, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > but >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > all nodes have the local ntp master and all are showing >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > sync. >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Regards, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeff >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Gregory Farnum >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> [ Keeping this on the users list. ] >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> Okay, so next time this happens you probably want to >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> do a >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> pg >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> query >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> on >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> the PG which has been reported as dirty. I can't help >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> much >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> beyond >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> that, but hopefully Kefu or David will chime in once >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> there's >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> a >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> little >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> more for them to look at. >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> -Greg >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Hi Greg, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > I'm running the ceph version hammer, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > ceph version 0.94.5 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > (9764da52395923e0b32908d83a9f7304401fee43) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > The hardware migration was performed by just setting >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > crush >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > map to >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > zero >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > for the OSD we wanted to retire. The system was >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > performing >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > poorly >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > with >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > these older OSDs and we had a difficult time >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > maintaining >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > stability of >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > system. The old OSDs are still there but all of >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > data >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > is >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > now >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > migrated >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > to new and/or existing hardware. >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Thanks, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeff >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Gregory Farnum >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Jeffrey McDonald >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> <jmcdonal@xxxxxxx> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Hi, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > For a while, we've been seeing inconsistent >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > placement >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > groups >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > on >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > our >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > erasure >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > coded system. The placement groups go from a >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > of >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+clean+inconsistent after a deep scrub: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044131 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub stat mismatch, got >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 hit_set_archive, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 hit_set_archive >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044416 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 deep-scrub 18 missing, 0 inconsistent >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:45:42.044464 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 deep-scrub 73 errors >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > So I tell the placement group to perform a >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > repair: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:26.047177 7f385d118700 0 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [INF] : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair starts >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:49:57.087291 7f3858b0a700 0 -- >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.2:6874/13937 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 10.31.0.6:6824/8127 pipe(0x2e578000 sd=697 :6874 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The repair finds missing shards and repairs them, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > but >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > then I >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > have >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 'unfound objects' : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.467590 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair stat mismatch, got 21446/21428 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > clones, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 21446/21428 dirty, 0/0 omap, 0/0 hit_set_archive, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 0/0 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > whiteouts, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 64682334170/64624353083 bytes,0/0 hit_set_archive >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > bytes. >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.468358 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320s0 repair 18 missing, 0 inconsistent >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > objects >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 2016-03-07 13:51:28.469431 7f385d118700 -1 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log_channel(cluster) >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > log >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [ERR] : >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 70.320 repair 73 errors, 73 fixed >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've traced one of the unfound objects all the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > way >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > through the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > I've found that they are not really lost. I can >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > fail >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > over >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > osd >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > and >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recover the files. This is happening quite >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > regularly >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > after a >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > large >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > migration of data from old hardware to >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > new(migration >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > is >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > now >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > complete). >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > The system sets the PG into 'recovery', but we've >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > seen >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > system >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > in >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > a >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > recovering state for many days. Should we just >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > be >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > patient >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or do >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > we >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > need >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > to dig further into the issue? >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> You may need to dig into this more, although I'm >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> not >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> sure >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> what >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> the >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> issue is likely to be. What version of Ceph are you >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> running? How >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> did >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> you do this hardware migration? >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> -Greg >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is stuck unclean for 704.803040, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > current >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > state >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > active+recovering, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > last acting [277,101,218,49,304,412] >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > pg 70.320 is active+recovering, acting >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > [277,101,218,49,304,412], >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 18 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > unfound >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > There is no indication of any problems with down >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > or >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > network >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > issues >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > with >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > OSDs. >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Thanks, >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeff >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > -- >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 625-6905 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > 624-8861 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > -- >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users mailing list >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >>> >> >>>>> >>> > >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> -- >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >> >>>>> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >> >>>>> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >> >>>>> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >> >>>>> >> 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >> >>>>> >> jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> >>>>> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >> >>>>> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> -- >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> >> >>>> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> >> >>>> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> >> >>>> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> >> >>>> 599 Walter Library email: >> >>> >> >>>> jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> >>>> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> >> >>>> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> > ceph-users mailing list >> >>> >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Email: >> >>> >> shinobu@xxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> GitHub: >> >>> >> shinobu-x >> >>> >> Blog: >> >>> >> Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > >> >>> > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >>> > Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >>> > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >>> > University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >>> > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >>> > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >>> > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Jeffrey McDonald, PhD >> >> Assistant Director for HPC Operations >> >> Minnesota Supercomputing Institute >> >> University of Minnesota Twin Cities >> >> 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx >> >> 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 >> >> Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- > > Jeffrey McDonald, PhD > Assistant Director for HPC Operations > Minnesota Supercomputing Institute > University of Minnesota Twin Cities > 599 Walter Library email: jeffrey.mcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx > 117 Pleasant St SE phone: +1 612 625-6905 > Minneapolis, MN 55455 fax: +1 612 624-8861 > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |