Re: Intel S3710 400GB and Samsung PM863 480GB fio results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>praising the SAS3008 CPU, but does anybody know if there are any
>>test/metrics in out there.

Hi,
I'm running dell poweredge r630 with perc h330 (sas3008) with intel s3610 1,6TB. (passthrough)


I can run an fio job if you want. (just give me the fio job config)


----- Mail original -----
De: "Mart van Santen" <mart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
À: "Alex Moore" <alex@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Lionel Bouton" <lionel-subscription@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Décembre 2015 14:47:11
Objet: Re:  Intel S3710 400GB and Samsung PM863 480GB fio results

Hello, 

I've checked with a MegaRaid SAS 2208, then I get ~40 MB/s, both with a 
1.9TB and a 240GB SM863 model. 
So it seems the LSI MegaRaid HBA's is not optimized for a lot of single 
job IOPS... 
Which raises for me the question, do we know more about HBAs suitable 
high performance ceph, in a previous post on this list I see the people 
praising the SAS3008 CPU, but does anybody know if there are any 
test/metrics in out there. 

Regards, 

Mart 


On 12/23/2015 10:20 PM, Alex Moore wrote: 
> As another data point, I recently bought a few 240GB SM863s, and found 
> I was getting 79 MB/s on the single job test. 
> 
> In my case the SSDs are running off the onboard Intel C204 chipset's 
> SATA controllers on a couple of systems with single Xeon E3-1240v2 CPUs. 
> 
> Alex 
> 
> On 23/12/2015 6:39 PM, Lionel Bouton wrote: 
>> Le 23/12/2015 18:37, Mart van Santen a écrit : 
>>> So, maybe you are right and is the HBA the bottleneck (LSI Logic / 
>>> Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2108). Under all cirumstances, I do not get 
>>> close to the numbers of the PM863 quoted by Sebastien. But his site 
>>> does not state what kind of HBA he is using.. 
>> In fact I was the one doing those tests and I added the relevant 
>> information in the comments (Disqus user Gyver): the PM863 tested is 
>> connected to the Intel C612 chipset SATA ports (configured as AHCI) of a 
>> dual Xeon E5v3 board, so this is a purely SATA configuration. 
>> 
>> Best regards, 
>> 
>> Lionel 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> ceph-users mailing list 
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 
> 

-- 
Mart van Santen 
Greenhost 
E: mart@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
T: +31 20 4890444 
W: https://greenhost.nl 

A PGP signature can be attached to this e-mail, 
you need PGP software to verify it. 
My public key is available in keyserver(s) 
see: http://tinyurl.com/openpgp-manual 

PGP Fingerprint: CA85 EB11 2B70 042D AF66 B29A 6437 01A1 10A3 D3A5 



_______________________________________________ 
ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux