Re: Intel S3710 400GB and Samsung PM863 480GB fio results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 22-12-15 13:43, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:
> Hello guys,
> 
> Was wondering if anyone has done testing on Samsung PM863 120 GB version to see how it performs? IMHO the 480GB version seems like a waste for the journal as you only need to have a small disk size to fit 3-4 osd journals. Unless you get a far greater durability.
> 

In that case I would look at the SM836 from Samsung. They are sold as
write-intensive SSDs.

Wido

> I am planning to replace my current journal ssds over the next month or so and would like to find out if there is an a good alternative to the Intel's 3700/3500 series. 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andrei
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@xxxxxxxx>
>> To: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, 21 December, 2015 19:12:33
>> Subject: Re:  Intel S3710 400GB and Samsung PM863 480GB fio results
> 
>> On 12/21/2015 05:30 PM, Lionel Bouton wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sébastien Han just added the test results I reported for these SSDs on
>>> the following page :
>>>
>>> http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/
>>>
>>> The table in the original post has the most important numbers and more
>>> details can be found in the comments.
>>>
>>> To sum things up, both have good performance (this isn't surprising for
>>> the S3710 but AFAIK this had to be confirmed for the PM863 and my
>>> company just purchased 2 of them just for these tests because they are
>>> the only "DC" SSDs available at one of our hosting providers).
>>> PM863 models are not designed for write-intensive applications and we
>>> have yet to see how they behave in the long run (in our case where PM863
>>> endurance is a bit short, if I had a choice we would test SM863 models
>>> if they were available to us).
>>>
>>> So at least for the PM863 please remember that this report is just about
>>> the performance side (on fresh SSDs) which arguably is excellent for the
>>> price but this doesn't address other conditions to check (performance
>>> consistency over the long run, real-world write endurance including
>>> write amplification, large scale testing to detect potential firmware
>>> bugs, ...).
>>>
>>
>> Interesting! I might be able to gain access to some PM836 3,84TB SSDs
>> later this week.
>>
>> I'll run the same tests if I can. Interesting to see how they perform.
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Lionel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wido den Hollander
>> 42on B.V.
>> Ceph trainer and consultant
>>
>> Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
>> Skype: contact42on
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux