Re: Intel S3710 400GB and Samsung PM863 480GB fio results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello guys,

Was wondering if anyone has done testing on Samsung PM863 120 GB version to see how it performs? IMHO the 480GB version seems like a waste for the journal as you only need to have a small disk size to fit 3-4 osd journals. Unless you get a far greater durability.

I am planning to replace my current journal ssds over the next month or so and would like to find out if there is an a good alternative to the Intel's 3700/3500 series. 

Thanks

Andrei

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, 21 December, 2015 19:12:33
> Subject: Re:  Intel S3710 400GB and Samsung PM863 480GB fio results

> On 12/21/2015 05:30 PM, Lionel Bouton wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Sébastien Han just added the test results I reported for these SSDs on
>> the following page :
>> 
>> http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/10/10/ceph-how-to-test-if-your-ssd-is-suitable-as-a-journal-device/
>> 
>> The table in the original post has the most important numbers and more
>> details can be found in the comments.
>> 
>> To sum things up, both have good performance (this isn't surprising for
>> the S3710 but AFAIK this had to be confirmed for the PM863 and my
>> company just purchased 2 of them just for these tests because they are
>> the only "DC" SSDs available at one of our hosting providers).
>> PM863 models are not designed for write-intensive applications and we
>> have yet to see how they behave in the long run (in our case where PM863
>> endurance is a bit short, if I had a choice we would test SM863 models
>> if they were available to us).
>> 
>> So at least for the PM863 please remember that this report is just about
>> the performance side (on fresh SSDs) which arguably is excellent for the
>> price but this doesn't address other conditions to check (performance
>> consistency over the long run, real-world write endurance including
>> write amplification, large scale testing to detect potential firmware
>> bugs, ...).
>> 
> 
> Interesting! I might be able to gain access to some PM836 3,84TB SSDs
> later this week.
> 
> I'll run the same tests if I can. Interesting to see how they perform.
> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Lionel
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Wido den Hollander
> 42on B.V.
> Ceph trainer and consultant
> 
> Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
> Skype: contact42on
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux