Hi, Le 29/09/2015 19:06, Samuel Just a écrit : > It's an EIO. The osd got an EIO from the underlying fs. That's what > causes those asserts. You probably want to redirect to the relevant > fs maling list. Thanks. I didn't get any answer on this from BTRFS developers yet. The problem seems hard to reproduce though (we still have the same configuration in production without any new crash and we only had a total of 3 OSD crashes). I'll just say for reference that BTRFS with kernel 3.18.9 looks suspicious to me (from the events that happened to us on a mixed 3.18.9/4.0.5 cluster statistically there's about 80% chances that there's a BTRFS bug in 3.18.9 solved in 4.0.5). Best regards, Lionel _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com