In my understanding, the deployment you suggested (local Ceph clusters + Rados Gateways) would imply giving up strong consistency guarantees. In that case, it is not what we are aiming for.
Thank you for your replies.
--
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Robert Sander <r.sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 29.09.2015 09:54, Raluca Halalai wrote:
> What do you want to prove with such a setup?
>
>
> It's for research purposes. We are trying different storage systems in a
> WAN environment.
Then Ceph can be ticked off the list of candidates.
Its purpose is not to be a WAN storage system.
It would be different if you setup local Ceph clusters and have Rados
Gateways (S3 Interfaces) interact with them (geo replication with the
radosgw agent).
Regards
--
Robert Sander
Heinlein Support GmbH
Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
http://www.heinlein-support.de
Tel: 030 / 405051-43
Fax: 030 / 405051-19
Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG:
HRB 93818 B / Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg,
Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
Raluca
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
