On 22/04/2015 16:04, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Mohamed Pakkeer <mdfakkeer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi sage, >> >> When can we expect the fully functional fsck for cephfs?. Can we get at next >> major release?. Is there any roadmap or time frame for the fully functional >> fsck release? > We're working on it as fast as we can, and it'll be done when it's > done. ;) More seriously, I'm still holding out a waning hope that > we'll have the "forward scrub" portion ready for Infernalis and then > we'll see how long it takes to assemble a working repair tool from > that. > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Marc <mail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I am curious about the current state of the roadmap as well. Alongside the >> already asked question Re vmware support, where are we at with cephfs' >> multiMDS stability and dynamic subtree partitioning? > Zheng has fixed a ton of bugs in these areas over the last year, but > both features are farther down the roadmap since we don't think we > need them for the earliest production users. > -Greg Thanks for letting us know! Due to the RedHat acquisition the ICE roadmap seems to have disappeared. Is a vmware driver still being worked on? With vmware being closed source and all, I imagine this lies mostly within the domain of VMware Inc., correct? Having iSCSI proxies as mediators is rather clunky... (And yes I am actively working on trying to get the interested parties to strongly look into KVM, but they have become very comfortable with VMware vsphere enterprise plus...) Thanks and have a nice weekend! _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |