Re: rbd: incorrect metadata

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/13/2015 03:17 PM, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> Yes, when you flatten an image, the snapshots will remain associated to the original parent.  This is a side-effect from how librbd handles CoW with clones.  There is an open RBD feature request to add support for flattening snapshots as well.  
> 
> 

So, I see which key/val pairs to remove. But I'm hesitant because I don't want
to make a mistake. The docs for rados_omap_get_next() say that key is
NULL-terminated. However looking at the hex for listomapvals rbd_children I see:

key: (34 bytes):
0000 : 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0e 00 00 00 63 65 31 62 : ............ce1b
0010 : 33 33 34 35 64 65 66 64 32 30 74 00 00 00 00 00 : 3345defd20t.....
0020 : 00 00                                           : ..

value: (22 bytes) :
0000 : 01 00 00 00 0e 00 00 00 31 63 63 30 35 61 31 33 : ........1cc05a13
0010 : 62 31 61 65 66 32                               : b1aef2

What am I missing?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux