Re: low power single disk nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Minnowboard Max?  2 atom cores, 1 SATA port, and a real (non-USB) Ethernet port.


On Thu, Apr 9, 2015, 8:03 AM phil@xxxxxxxxx <phil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rather expensive option:

Applied Micro X-Gene, overkill for a single disk, and only really available in a
development kit format right now.

<https://www.apm.com/products/data-center/x-gene-family/x-c1-development-kits/>

Better Option:

Ambedded CY7 - 7 nodes in 1U half Depth, 6 positions for SATA disks, and one
node with mSATA SSD

<http://www.ambedded.com.tw/pt_list.php?CM_ID=20140214001>

--phil

> On 09 April 2015 at 15:57 Quentin Hartman <qhartman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>  I'm skeptical about how well this would work, but a Banana Pi might be a
> place to start. Like a raspberry pi, but it has a SATA connector:
> http://www.bananapi.org/
>
>  On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Jerker Nyberg <jerker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:jerker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>    > >    Hello ceph users,
> >
> >    Is anyone running any low powered single disk nodes with Ceph now?
> > Calxeda seems to be no more according to Wikipedia. I do not think HP
> > moonshot is what I am looking for - I want stand-alone nodes, not server
> > cartridges integrated into server chassis. And I do not want to be locked to
> > a single vendor.
> >
> >    I was playing with Raspberry Pi 2 for signage when I thought of my old
> > experiments with Ceph.
> >
> >    I am thinking of for example Odroid-C1 or Odroid-XU3 Lite or maybe
> > something with a low-power Intel x64/x86 processor. Together with one SSD or
> > one low power HDD the node could get all power via PoE (via splitter or
> > integrated into board if such boards exist). PoE provide remote power-on
> > power-off even for consumer grade nodes.
> >
> >    The cost for a single low power node should be able to compete with
> > traditional PC-servers price per disk. Ceph take care of redundancy.
> >
> >    I think simple custom casing should be good enough - maybe just strap or
> > velcro everything on trays in the rack, at least for the nodes with SSD.
> >
> >    Kind regards,
> >    --
> >    Jerker Nyberg, Uppsala, Sweden.
> >    _______________________________________________
> >    ceph-users mailing list
> >    ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxx.com>
> >    http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> > <http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com>
> >  >  _______________________________________________
>  ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux