Re: SSD Journaling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark,

Yes my reads are consistently slower. I have testes both Random and Sequential and various block sizes.

Thanks
Pankaj

-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 1:07 PM
To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  SSD Journaling

On 03/30/2015 03:01 PM, Garg, Pankaj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm benchmarking my small cluster with HDDs vs HDDs with SSD Journaling.
> I am using both RADOS bench and Block device (using fio) for testing.
>
> I am seeing significant Write performance improvements, as expected. I 
> am however seeing the Reads coming out a bit slower on the SSD 
> Journaling side. They are not terribly different, but sometimes 10% slower.
>
> Is that something other folks have also seen, or do I need some 
> settings to be tuned properly? I'm wondering if accessing 2 drives for 
> reads, adds latency and hence the throughput suffers.

Hi,

What kind of reads are you seeing the degradation with?  Is it consistent with different sizes and random/seq?  Any interesting spikes or valleys during the tests?

>
> Thanks
>
> Pankaj
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux