Re: tgt and krbd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/03/2015, at 16.50, Jake Young <jak3kaj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> After seeing your results, I've been considering experimenting with that.  Currently, my iSCSI proxy nodes are VMs.  
> 
> I would like to build a few dedicated servers with fast SSDs or fusion-io devices.  It depends on my budget, it's hard to justify getting a card that costs 10x the rest of the server...  I would run all my tgt instances in containers pointing to the rbd disk+cache device.  A fusion-io device could support many tgt containers.
> 
> I don't really want to go back to krbd.  I have a few rbd's that are format 2 with striping, there aren't any stable kernels that support that (or any kernels at all yet for "fancy striping"). 

> I wish there was a way to incorporate a local cache device into tgt with librbd backends.
What about a ram disk device like rapid disk+cache in front of your rbd block device

http://www.rapiddisk.org/?page_id=15#rapiddisk

/Steffen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux