Re: RGW put file question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




when I put the same file with multi threads, sometimes  put file head oid "ref.ioctx.operate(ref.oid, &op); " return -ECANCELED. I think this is normal.
but fuction jump to done_cancel, and run the complete_update_index_cancel(or index_op.cancel() ), but  osd execute rgw_bucket_complete_op with CLS_RGW_OP_ADD and file size must be 0;
so at this moment bucket index record file size is zero. I think this is not right.
 

baijiaruo@xxxxxxx
 
Date: 2015-02-05 12:06
Subject: Re: RGW put file question
 
 
----- Original Message -----
> From: baijiaruo@xxxxxxx
> To: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 5:47:03 PM
> Subject: RGW put file question
>
> when I put file failed, and run the function "
> RGWRados::cls_obj_complete_cancel",
> why we use CLS_RGW_OP_ADD not use CLS_RGW_OP_CANCEL?
> why we set poolid is -1 and set epoch is 0?
>
 
I'm not sure, could very well be a bug. It should definitely be OP_CANCEL, but going back through the history it seems like it has been OP_ADD since at least argonaut. How did you notice it? It might explain a couple of issues that we've been seeing.
 
Yehuda
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux