Re: RGW put file question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: baijiaruo@xxxxxxx
> To: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 5:47:03 PM
> Subject:  RGW put file question
> 
> when I put file failed, and run the function "
> RGWRados::cls_obj_complete_cancel",
> why we use CLS_RGW_OP_ADD not use CLS_RGW_OP_CANCEL?
> why we set poolid is -1 and set epoch is 0?
> 

I'm not sure, could very well be a bug. It should definitely be OP_CANCEL, but going back through the history it seems like it has been OP_ADD since at least argonaut. How did you notice it? It might explain a couple of issues that we've been seeing.

Yehuda
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux