I am curious whether the object can be uploaded without MultiUpload, so we can determine which part is wrong. On 21 January 2015 at 09:15, Gleb Borisov <borisov.gleb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > We're experiencing some issues with our radosgw setup. Today we tried to > copy bunch of objects between two separate clusters (using our own tool > built on top of java s3 api). > > All went smooth until we start copying large objects (200G+). We can see > that our code handles this case correctly and started multipart upload > (s3.initiateMultipartUpload), then it uploaded all the parts in serial mode > (s3.uploadPart) and finally completed upload (s3.completeMultipartUpload). > > When we've checked consistency of two clusters we found that we have a lot > of zero-sized objects (which turns to be our large objects). > > I've made more verbose log from radosgw: > > two requests (put_obj, complete_multipart) - > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/840e0aee5a7ce0326368 (all finished with > 200) > > radosgw-admin object stat output: > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/2b6771bbbad3021364e2 > > We've tried to upload these objects several times without any luck. > > # radosgw --version > ceph version 0.87 (c51c8f9d80fa4e0168aa52685b8de40e42758578) > > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Best regards, > Gleb M Borisov > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > -- Dong Yuan Email:yuandong1222@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |