Re: Improving Performance with more OSD's?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:26:08 AM Eneko Lacunza wrote:
>  have a small setup with such a node (only 4 GB RAM, another 2 good 
> nodes for OSD and virtualization) - it works like a charm and CPU max is 
> always under 5% in the graphs. It only peaks when backups are dumped to 
> its 1TB disk using NFS.

Yes, CPU has not been a problem for em at all, I even occasional run a windows 
VM on the NUC.

Sounds like we have very similar setups - 2 good ndoes that run full osd's, 
mon and VM's, and a third smaller node for quorum.

Do you have OSD's on your thrid ndoe as well?

> > I'd advise against it.
> > That node doing both monitor and OSDs is not going to end well.
> 
> My experience has led me not to trust USB disks for continuous 
> operation, I wouldn't do this either.

Yeah, it doesn't sound like a good idea. Pity, the nucs are so small and quiet

thanks,

-- 
Lindsay

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux