Re: When is the rctime updated in CephFS?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wido,

I'm really interested in your script.
Will you release it ? I'm sure I'm not the only one interested ;)

If you need some help (testing or something else), don't hesitate to ask
me.

-- 
Thomas Lemarchand
Cloud Solutions SAS - Responsable des systèmes d'information



On jeu., 2014-12-18 at 15:47 +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> On 12/18/2014 03:37 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've been playing around a bit with the recursive statistics for CephFS
> >> today and I'm seeing some behavior with the rstats what I don't understand.
> >>
> >> I /A/B/C in my CephFS.
> >>
> >> I changed a file in 'C' and the ceph.dir.rctime xattr changed
> >> immediately. I've been waiting for 60 minutes now, but /A and /A/B still
> >> have their old rctime.
> >>
> >> A: 1418905422 (18-12-2014 13:23:42)
> >> B: 1418905422 (18-12-2014 13:23:42)
> >> C: 1418909134 (18-12-2014 14:25:34)
> >>
> >> It's 15:21:34 right now, so after 1 hour the rctime of A and B still
> >> hasn't updated.
> >>
> >> How long does this take? I know the MDS is lazy in updating the rstats,
> >> but one hour is quite long, isn't it?
> > 
> > This is a bit of a loose end at the moment.  The client doesn't have any 
> > refresh value for these stats.  Right now an 'ls' in the parent dir will 
> > get you a fresh value, but repeatedly calling 'stat' will keep giving you 
> > the cached value.
> > 
> 
> The ls didn't really trigger it for me. I'm using getfattr btw:
> 
> $ getfattr -n ceph.dir.rctime /mnt/cephfs/A
> 
> I unmounted and mounted and it worked right away.
> 
> So this is probably not a real issue on a active filesystem where lots
> of I/O on that client is happening, right?
> 
> I'm building a PoC backup script which uses the rctimes to backup CephFS
> in a reasonable way, not having rsync scan the whole tree.
> 
> > I'm not sure what the right fix is.  The normal inode fields are all 
> > perfectly accurate, and the protocol is built around making sure that's 
> > the case.. not giving "reasonably timely" values to the new stuff. :/
> > 
> > sage
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wido den Hollander
> 42on B.V.
> Ceph trainer and consultant
> 
> Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
> Skype: contact42on
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com





[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux