On Fri, 5 Dec 2014, Antonio Messina wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The v2 rule means you have a crush rule for erasure coding. Do you have > > an EC pool in your cluster? > > Yes indeed. I didn't know EC pool was incompatible with the current > kernel, I only tested it with rados bench and VMs, I guess. > > > The tunables3 feature bit is set because you set the vary_r parameter. > > This I don't really know where it comes from. I think at a certain > point I ran "ceph osd crush tunables optimal", and it probably added > "vary_r", but then I run "ceph osd crush tunables firefly" and it > didn't remove it... is it normal? Yeah. The tunable profiles are a bit confusing because they are defined as what is *supported* in that release, not what the default is (currently still bobtail to allow client support to catch up). Unfortunatley it takes time for that to happen! To make things a bit more interesting there's a bug in firefly that doesn't show teh vary_r tunable value in that dump. Anyway, sounds like you sorted it out. Thanks! sage _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com