Re: Giant or Firefly for production

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Alba <ascanio.alba7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Cephers,
>
> Have anyone of you decided to put Giant into production instead of Firefly?

This is very interesting to me too: we are going to deploy a large
ceph cluster on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, and so far what I have found is that
the rbd module in Ubuntu Trusty doesn't seem compatible with giant:

    feature set mismatch, my 4a042a42 < server's 2104a042a42, missing
21000000000

I tried with different "ceph osd tunables" but nothing seems to fix the issue

However, this cluster will be mainly used for OpenStack, and qemu is
able to access the rbd volume, so this might not be a big problem for
me.

.a.

-- 
antonio.messina@xxxxxxxxxxx                     +41 (0)44 635 42 22
antonio.s.messina@xxxxxxxxx
S3IT: Service and Support for Science IT   http://www.s3it.uzh.ch/
University of Zurich
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zurich Switzerland
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux