We are using v0.80.4. Just would like to ask for general suggestion here :) Thanks, Guang ________________________________ > From: malmyzh@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:46:12 +0000 > Subject: Re: PG inconsistency > To: yguang11@xxxxxxxxxxx; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > What is your version of the ceph? > 0.80.0 - 0.80.3 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/7557a8139425d1705b481d7f010683169fd5e49b > > Thu Nov 06 2014 at 16:24:21, GuangYang > <yguang11@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:yguang11@xxxxxxxxxxx>>: > Hello Cephers, > Recently we observed a couple of inconsistencies in our Ceph cluster, > there were two major patterns leading to inconsistency as I observed: > 1) EIO to read the file, 2) the digest is inconsistent (for EC) even > there is no read error). > > While ceph has built-in tool sets to repair the inconsistencies, I also > would like to check with the community in terms of what is the best > ways to handle such issues (e.g. should we run fsck / xfs_repair when > such issue happens). > > In more details, I have the following questions: > 1. When there is inconsistency detected, what is the chance there is > some hardware issues which need to be repaired physically, or should I > run some disk/filesystem tools to further check? > 2. Should we use fsck / xfs_repair to fix the inconsistencies, or > should we solely relay on Ceph's repair tool sets? > > It would be great to hear you experience and suggestions. > > BTW, we are using XFS in the cluster. > > Thanks, > Guang > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |