Your solution of pre-pending the environment name to the bucket, was my first choice, but at the moment I can't ask the devs to change the code to do that. For now I have to stick with the zones solution. Should I follow the federated zones docs (http://ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/federated-config/) but skip the sync step? Thank you, Marco Garcês On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Craig Lewis <clewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You could setup dedicated zones for each environment, and not > replicate between them. > > Each zone would have it's own URL, but you would be able to re-use > usernames and bucket names. If different URLs are a problem, you > might be able to get around that in the load balancer or the web > servers. I wouldn't really recommend that, but it's possible. > > > I have a similar requirement. I was able to pre-pending the > environment name to the bucket in my client code, which made things > much easier. > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Marco Garcês <marco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I have this situation, where I'm using the same Ceph cluster (with >> radosgw), for two different environments, QUAL and PRE-PRODUCTION. >> >> I need different users for each environment, but I need to create the >> same buckets, with the same name; I understand there is no way to have >> 2 buckets with the same name, but how can I go around this? Perhaps >> creating a different pool for each user? >> >> Can you help me? Thank you in advance, my best regards, >> >> Marco Garcês >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |