October 30 2014 11:32 AM, "Daniel Schneller" <daniel.schneller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2014-10-30 10:14:44 +0000, Dan van der Ster said: > >> Hi Daniel, >> I can't remember if deleting a pool invokes the snap trimmer to do the >> actual work deleting objects. But if it does, then it is most >> definitely broken in everything except latest releases (actual dumpling >> doesn't have the fix yet in a release). >> Given a release with those fixes (see tracker #9487) then you should >> enable the snap trim sleep (e.g. 0.05) and set the io priority class to >> 3 or idle. >> Cheers, Dan > > Dan, thank you for the hint. > > I have looked at the ticket, but I am not too familiar with trac (yet) > to understand the current state. The header part says "Status: Pending > Backport" and "Backport: dumpling". At the very bottom (as of now ;)) > however, I see a revision > > Revision 496e561d > Added by Samuel Just 3 days ago > ReplicatedPG: don't move on to the next snap immediately > If we have a bunch of trimmed snaps for which we have no > objects, we'll spin for a long time. Instead, requeue. > Fixes: #9487 > Backport: dumpling, firefly, giant > Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@xxxxxxxxxxx> > (cherry picked from commit c17ac03a50da523f250eb6394c89cc7e93cb4659) > > Does this mean there will be a backport to firefly, too, and that the > bug status (the header of the page) hasn't been updated yet? > I think the backport to firefly is still pending, like dumpling. Here at the top are the commits you need to see: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/wip-9113-9487-dumpling I don't see those in the firefly branch yet. Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |