Ceph and low latency kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

which one you are talking about? -rt patchset has absolutely no
difference for Ceph, though very specific workload (which I was unable
to imagine at a time) can benefit of it a little. Windriver variant
means much more, because it rt`ing virtualized envs - in combination
with storage nodes you may achieve a lot better deadlines for tasks
like gaming servers and so on, but I had not tried it.

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
<s.priebe at profihost.ag> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has anybody ever tried to use a low latency kernel for ceph? Does it make any differences?
>
> Greets,
> Stefan
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux